---
title: "Why Do Core Tool Handles Develop Looseness During OEM Production?"
description: "Facing loose core handle defects during initial OEM component cooperation can threaten product quality and brand reputation. Systematic analysis of design, tooling, process, and material root causes, paired with actionable fixes and preventive controls, ensures consistent quality, cuts rework costs, and supports smooth mass production ramp-up."
url: "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html"
language: "en"
type: "Q&A"
category: "Custom Manufacturing Q&A"
datePublished: "2026-10-22"
dateModified: "2026-10-22"
brand: "OK TOOL"
manufacturer: "OK TOOL"
answerCount: 10
---

# Why Do Core Tool Handles Develop Looseness During OEM Production?

## Question

 As the founder of an independent hand tool brand, I’m currently in final negotiations with your factory for our first OEM partnership. Last week, we received 50 pre-production samples of our core hand tool components, and we’ve noticed a critical issue: approximately 30% of the tool handles have noticeable looseness—when twisted, they wobble more than 2mm, which is way beyond our brand’s quality standards. This has me really anxious because we’re aiming to launch our product line in 3 months, and any delays or quality defects could harm our brand’s initial reputation. I need to understand exactly what’s causing this looseness, how we can fix it quickly in the sample phase, and what measures we can put in place to ensure this doesn’t happen during mass production. Can you walk me through the root causes and actionable steps we should take together? 

## Answers
                            
### Answer 1 — Best Answer

The loose core handle issue in your pre-production samples is a critical quality concern that requires targeted root cause analysis and corrective actions before we proceed to mass production. Based on our 20+ years of experience in hardware and plastic component manufacturing, this defect typically stems from four key areas: design for manufacturability (DFM) oversights, tooling inaccuracies, inconsistent injection molding processes, or suboptimal material selection.

First, design-related issues could include mismatched mating tolerances between the handle’s inner bore and the core shaft, or insufficient draft angles that cause tight spots during assembly, leading to eventual loosening as parts wear. Tooling problems may involve improperly machined mold inserts with dimensional deviations beyond the required ±0.02mm, or worn ejector pins that deform the handle’s inner surface during ejection. Injection process inconsistencies, such as uneven cooling time or incorrect melt temperature, can cause plastic handle warpage, creating gaps between the handle and core shaft. Finally, using a resin with low flexural strength may result in the handle’s inner bore stretching over repeated use, leading to loosening.

To resolve this issue immediately, we recommend starting with a full dimensional audit of both the defective samples and the production mold to identify specific tolerance deviations. If design is the root cause, we’ll adjust the mating surfaces to add a 0.5-1° draft angle and tighten the tolerance to ±0.015mm between the handle bore and core shaft. For tooling issues, our team will rework or replace worn mold inserts to restore precise dimensions. We’ll also optimize injection parameters—extending cooling time by 10-15% and adjusting melt temperature to reduce warpage. If material is the culprit, we’ll test alternative resin grades with higher flexural strength (minimum 80 MPa) to ensure long-term fit retention.

To prevent this from recurring in mass production, we’ll implement **first article inspection (FAI)** for every new mold run to validate dimensional accuracy before full production. We’ll also set up **IPQC checkpoints** at 2-hour intervals to randomly test handle-core fit, measuring wobble to ensure it stays below your 0.5mm threshold. Additionally, we’ll establish a scheduled mold maintenance program to inspect inserts and ejector pins every 5,000 shots, preventing wear that causes dimensional drift. Finally, we’ll formalize a sample sign-off protocol with your team to align on all quality metrics, including handle tightness, before initiating mass production.

**status:** accepted
**Author:** David Zhang
**Date:** 2026-10-22

### Answer 2

When evaluating the design for manufacturability of your core handle, uneven wall thickness in the plastic component is a common overlooked factor that can lead to warpage and subsequent loosening. If the handle’s wall thickness varies by more than 0.3mm, the plastic will cool at inconsistent rates, causing the inner bore to deform and create gaps with the core shaft. To address this, we recommend standardizing the wall thickness to within ±0.1mm across the entire handle.

Additionally, adding subtle knurling on the core shaft’s mating surface can improve friction between the handle and shaft without increasing assembly complexity. We also advise ensuring draft angles are consistent on all inner bore surfaces—even a 0.2° variation can lead to forced assembly, which stretches the inner bore over time and causes loosening. These design adjustments will enhance toolability and reduce the risk of fit issues in production.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Olivia Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-22

### Answer 3

The choice of mold steel directly impacts the long-term dimensional stability of your core handle components, which is critical for preventing loose fits. Using lower-grade steels like P20 for mold inserts can lead to rapid wear and dimensional drift after just 20,000 shots, resulting in inconsistent inner bore sizes. We recommend upgrading to S136 stainless steel for the mold inserts, as its high corrosion resistance and hardness maintain precise tolerances over 100,000 shots.

Proper heat treatment of the mold components is equally important—quenching and tempering the inserts to a hardness of HRC 48-52 will prevent deformation during high-temperature injection cycles, which can cause the inner bore to warp. Implementing a proactive maintenance schedule, where inserts are inspected for wear every 5,000 shots, will also help catch deviations early and avoid bulk production defects.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Jason Zhou
**Date:** 2026-10-22

### Answer 4

Integrating a formal design-for-manufacture (DFM) review early in the project timeline—before mold fabrication begins—can proactively identify design flaws that lead to loose core handles. By aligning on manufacturability risks at this stage, we can avoid costly reworks and delays later. We’ll also establish clear milestone checkpoints: after mold completion, we’ll run 20 initial samples for dimensional validation, and your team will sign off on these before we proceed to pre-production.

If any design or tooling adjustments are needed to fix the loose handle issue, we’ll implement a formal change control process, documenting every modification and re-testing samples to ensure compliance with your quality standards. This structured approach will ensure that production transfer is smooth, and all risks are mitigated before we start mass manufacturing, keeping your 3-month launch timeline on track.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Sophia Wang
**Date:** 2026-10-22

### Answer 5

To effectively address and prevent loose core handles, we need to define clear, measurable inspection criteria. For handle tightness, we’ll implement two key tests: using a torque wrench to measure a minimum retention force of 15 N·m (ensuring the handle won’t slip under normal use) and a dial indicator to measure wobble, with a maximum allowable deviation of 0.5mm. We’ll integrate these checks into our IQC process for incoming core shafts, IPQC during assembly, and OQC for finished products.

For any defective parts found, we’ll initiate a corrective action plan (CAPA) that traces the defect back to specific production runs, identifies the root cause, and implements targeted fixes. We’ll also maintain detailed inspection records for every batch, allowing us to track quality trends and address potential issues before they escalate to mass production.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Linda Xu
**Date:** 2026-10-22

### Answer 6

Implementing lean manufacturing techniques can reduce variation in core handle assembly and prevent loose fits. A poka-yoke (mistake-proofing) system, such as a press-fit jig with a built-in pressure sensor, will ensure that each handle is seated to the exact depth required—if the pressure falls outside the predefined range (10-12 kN), the jig will stop the assembly process, preventing loose parts from moving forward.

We’ll also analyze production data to identify bottlenecks that contribute to inconsistent fit, such as variable injection molding cycles or manual assembly errors. By standardizing work instructions and training assembly staff on proper press-fit techniques, we can reduce human error and improve yield. Additionally, we’ll conduct regular process audits to ensure that all steps are followed consistently, leading to sustainable quality gains over time.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Kevin Liu
**Date:** 2026-10-22

### Answer 7

The machining strategy for mold inserts plays a critical role in achieving the precise tolerances needed to prevent loose core handles. Using a 5-axis CNC machine instead of a 3-axis machine allows us to machine the inner bore of the handle insert from multiple angles, ensuring dimensional accuracy within ±0.005mm. We’ll also use a precision hydraulic fixture to hold the insert during machining, reducing runout and ensuring consistent wall thickness across all parts.

A smooth surface finish (Ra 0.8) on the inner bore is equally important—this reduces friction during assembly, preventing forced fitting that stretches the handle’s inner surface over time. We’ll validate the machining accuracy using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) after each insert is produced, ensuring that all dimensions meet your design specifications before mold assembly.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Daniel Yang
**Date:** 2026-10-22

### Answer 8

Gate location and mold structure decisions have a direct impact on plastic flow and part warpage, which can lead to loose core handles. Placing the gate at the end of the handle, away from the mating surface with the core shaft, reduces internal stress in the critical fit area, minimizing warpage that creates gaps. We also recommend using a hot runner system instead of a cold runner for mold fabrication—this ensures consistent melt temperature across all cavities, reducing part-to-part variation in inner bore size.

Additionally, incorporating ejector pins at non-critical locations (away from the inner bore) will prevent deformation during part ejection, which can cause the inner surface to become uneven and lead to loose fits. These mold design adjustments will improve part quality consistency and reduce the risk of fit issues in production.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Eric Zhao
**Date:** 2026-10-22

### Answer 9

Inconsistent injection process parameters are a common cause of plastic handle warpage, which leads to loose fits with core shafts. Optimizing packing pressure is key—setting it to 80-90% of the injection pressure ensures that the plastic fills the mold cavity uniformly, reducing voids and internal stress that cause warpage. We’ll also adjust the cooling time: extending it by 10-15% will allow the plastic to cool more evenly, preventing the inner bore from deforming.

Maintaining a consistent mold temperature (60-70°C for most engineering plastics) using a mold temperature controller will further reduce cooling-related variation. We’ll run a process capability study (Cp/Cpk) to validate that the optimized parameters produce parts within your tolerance range, ensuring that every handle has a precise inner bore size for a tight fit with the core shaft.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Emily Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-22

### Answer 10

Choosing the right resin grade balances mechanical properties, cost, and manufacturability to prevent loose core handles. While high-strength engineering plastics offer excellent fit retention, they can be costly and difficult to process.

We recommend testing a 30% glass-filled nylon grade, which provides a flexural strength of 95 MPa (well above the minimum 80 MPa needed for long-term fit) and good dimensional stability. This grade also has low shrinkage rates (0.3-0.5%), reducing the risk of inner bore deformation during cooling.

To improve flow during injection without compromising strength, we can add a small amount of internal lubricant (0.5-1% by weight) to the resin, which reduces internal stress and warpage. We’ll provide material test samples for you to evaluate, ensuring that the selected grade meets your quality and cost requirements.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Michael Wu
**Date:** 2026-10-22

## Related Resources

- [Custom Manufacturing Q&A](https://www.jaterson.com/qa/oem-odm/)
- [Products](https://www.jaterson.com/products/)
- [Capabilities](https://www.jaterson.com/capabilities/)
- [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.jaterson.com/custom-manufacturing/)
- [Manufacturing Guides](https://www.jaterson.com/manufacturing/)
- [Buying Guides](https://www.jaterson.com/buying/)
- [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.jaterson.com/knowledge/)

## Structured Data

```json
[
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "QAPage",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "Why Do Core Tool Handles Develop Looseness During OEM Production?",
        "text": "As the founder of an independent hand tool brand, I’m currently in final negotiations with your factory for our first OEM partnership. Last week, we received 50 pre-production samples of our core hand tool components, and we’ve noticed a critical issue: approximately 30% of the tool handles have noticeable looseness—when twisted, they wobble more than 2mm, which is way beyond our brand’s quality standards. This has me really anxious because we’re aiming to launch our product line in 3 months, and any delays or quality defects could harm our brand’s initial reputation. I need to understand exactly what’s causing this looseness, how we can fix it quickly in the sample phase, and what measures we can put in place to ensure this doesn’t happen during mass production. Can you walk me through the root causes and actionable steps we should take together?",
        "answerCount": 10,
        "upvoteCount": 8,
        "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:11:31Z",
        "dateModified": "2026-10-22T14:14:41Z",
        "author": {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Anonymous",
          "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html"
        }
                ,"acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The loose core handle issue in your pre-production samples is a critical quality concern that requires targeted root cause analysis and corrective actions before we proceed to mass production. Based on our 20+ years of experience in hardware and plastic component manufacturing, this defect typically stems from four key areas: design for manufacturability (DFM) oversights, tooling inaccuracies, inconsistent injection molding processes, or suboptimal material selection. First, design-related issues could include mismatched mating tolerances between the handle’s inner bore and the core shaft, or insufficient draft angles that cause tight spots during assembly, leading to eventual loosening as parts wear. Tooling problems may involve improperly machined mold inserts with dimensional deviations beyond the required ±0.02mm, or worn ejector pins that deform the handle’s inner surface during ejection. Injection process inconsistencies, such as uneven cooling time or incorrect melt temperature, can cause plastic handle warpage, creating gaps between the handle and core shaft. Finally, using a resin with low flexural strength may result in the handle’s inner bore stretching over repeated use, leading to loosening. To resolve this issue immediately, we recommend starting with a full dimensional audit of both the defective samples and the production mold to identify specific tolerance deviations. If design is the root cause, we’ll adjust the mating surfaces to add a 0.5-1° draft angle and tighten the tolerance to ±0.015mm between the handle bore and core shaft. For tooling issues, our team will rework or replace worn mold inserts to restore precise dimensions. We’ll also optimize injection parameters—extending cooling time by 10-15% and adjusting melt temperature to reduce warpage. If material is the culprit, we’ll test alternative resin grades with higher flexural strength (minimum 80 MPa) to ensure long-term fit retention. To prevent this from recurring in mass production, we’ll implement first article inspection (FAI) for every new mold run to validate dimensional accuracy before full production. We’ll also set up IPQC checkpoints at 2-hour intervals to randomly test handle-core fit, measuring wobble to ensure it stays below your 0.5mm threshold. Additionally, we’ll establish a scheduled mold maintenance program to inspect inserts and ejector pins every 5,000 shots, preventing wear that causes dimensional drift. Finally, we’ll formalize a sample sign-off protocol with your team to align on all quality metrics, including handle tightness, before initiating mass production.",
            "upvoteCount": 8,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#acceptedAnswer",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:47:39Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "David Zhang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/david.html"}        }
                ,"suggestedAnswer": [
                  {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "When evaluating the design for manufacturability of your core handle, uneven wall thickness in the plastic component is a common overlooked factor that can lead to warpage and subsequent loosening. If the handle’s wall thickness varies by more than 0.3mm, the plastic will cool at inconsistent rates, causing the inner bore to deform and create gaps with the core shaft. To address this, we recommend standardizing the wall thickness to within ±0.1mm across the entire handle. Additionally, adding subtle knurling on the core shaft’s mating surface can improve friction between the handle and shaft without increasing assembly complexity. We also advise ensuring draft angles are consistent on all inner bore surfaces—even a 0.2° variation can lead to forced assembly, which stretches the inner bore over time and causes loosening. These design adjustments will enhance toolability and reduce the risk of fit issues in production.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#suggestedAnswer-2",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:47:01Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Olivia Chen","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/olivia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The choice of mold steel directly impacts the long-term dimensional stability of your core handle components, which is critical for preventing loose fits. Using lower-grade steels like P20 for mold inserts can lead to rapid wear and dimensional drift after just 20,000 shots, resulting in inconsistent inner bore sizes. We recommend upgrading to S136 stainless steel for the mold inserts, as its high corrosion resistance and hardness maintain precise tolerances over 100,000 shots. Proper heat treatment of the mold components is equally important—quenching and tempering the inserts to a hardness of HRC 48-52 will prevent deformation during high-temperature injection cycles, which can cause the inner bore to warp. Implementing a proactive maintenance schedule, where inserts are inspected for wear every 5,000 shots, will also help catch deviations early and avoid bulk production defects.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#suggestedAnswer-3",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:41:14Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Jason Zhou","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/jason.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Integrating a formal design-for-manufacture (DFM) review early in the project timeline—before mold fabrication begins—can proactively identify design flaws that lead to loose core handles. By aligning on manufacturability risks at this stage, we can avoid costly reworks and delays later. We’ll also establish clear milestone checkpoints: after mold completion, we’ll run 20 initial samples for dimensional validation, and your team will sign off on these before we proceed to pre-production. If any design or tooling adjustments are needed to fix the loose handle issue, we’ll implement a formal change control process, documenting every modification and re-testing samples to ensure compliance with your quality standards. This structured approach will ensure that production transfer is smooth, and all risks are mitigated before we start mass manufacturing, keeping your 3-month launch timeline on track.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#suggestedAnswer-4",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:33:00Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Sophia Wang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/sophia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "To effectively address and prevent loose core handles, we need to define clear, measurable inspection criteria. For handle tightness, we’ll implement two key tests: using a torque wrench to measure a minimum retention force of 15 N·m (ensuring the handle won’t slip under normal use) and a dial indicator to measure wobble, with a maximum allowable deviation of 0.5mm. We’ll integrate these checks into our IQC process for incoming core shafts, IPQC during assembly, and OQC for finished products. For any defective parts found, we’ll initiate a corrective action plan (CAPA) that traces the defect back to specific production runs, identifies the root cause, and implements targeted fixes. We’ll also maintain detailed inspection records for every batch, allowing us to track quality trends and address potential issues before they escalate to mass production.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#suggestedAnswer-5",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:30:48Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Linda Xu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/linda.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Implementing lean manufacturing techniques can reduce variation in core handle assembly and prevent loose fits. A poka-yoke (mistake-proofing) system, such as a press-fit jig with a built-in pressure sensor, will ensure that each handle is seated to the exact depth required—if the pressure falls outside the predefined range (10-12 kN), the jig will stop the assembly process, preventing loose parts from moving forward. We’ll also analyze production data to identify bottlenecks that contribute to inconsistent fit, such as variable injection molding cycles or manual assembly errors. By standardizing work instructions and training assembly staff on proper press-fit techniques, we can reduce human error and improve yield. Additionally, we’ll conduct regular process audits to ensure that all steps are followed consistently, leading to sustainable quality gains over time.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#suggestedAnswer-6",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:25:47Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Kevin Liu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/kevin.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The machining strategy for mold inserts plays a critical role in achieving the precise tolerances needed to prevent loose core handles. Using a 5-axis CNC machine instead of a 3-axis machine allows us to machine the inner bore of the handle insert from multiple angles, ensuring dimensional accuracy within ±0.005mm. We’ll also use a precision hydraulic fixture to hold the insert during machining, reducing runout and ensuring consistent wall thickness across all parts. A smooth surface finish (Ra 0.8) on the inner bore is equally important—this reduces friction during assembly, preventing forced fitting that stretches the handle’s inner surface over time. We’ll validate the machining accuracy using a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) after each insert is produced, ensuring that all dimensions meet your design specifications before mold assembly.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#suggestedAnswer-7",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:20:52Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/daniel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Gate location and mold structure decisions have a direct impact on plastic flow and part warpage, which can lead to loose core handles. Placing the gate at the end of the handle, away from the mating surface with the core shaft, reduces internal stress in the critical fit area, minimizing warpage that creates gaps. We also recommend using a hot runner system instead of a cold runner for mold fabrication—this ensures consistent melt temperature across all cavities, reducing part-to-part variation in inner bore size. Additionally, incorporating ejector pins at non-critical locations (away from the inner bore) will prevent deformation during part ejection, which can cause the inner surface to become uneven and lead to loose fits. These mold design adjustments will improve part quality consistency and reduce the risk of fit issues in production.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#suggestedAnswer-8",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:15:55Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Eric Zhao","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/eric.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Inconsistent injection process parameters are a common cause of plastic handle warpage, which leads to loose fits with core shafts. Optimizing packing pressure is key—setting it to 80-90% of the injection pressure ensures that the plastic fills the mold cavity uniformly, reducing voids and internal stress that cause warpage. We’ll also adjust the cooling time: extending it by 10-15% will allow the plastic to cool more evenly, preventing the inner bore from deforming. Maintaining a consistent mold temperature (60-70°C for most engineering plastics) using a mold temperature controller will further reduce cooling-related variation. We’ll run a process capability study (Cp/Cpk) to validate that the optimized parameters produce parts within your tolerance range, ensuring that every handle has a precise inner bore size for a tight fit with the core shaft.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#suggestedAnswer-9",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:15:14Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Emily Chen","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/emily.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Choosing the right resin grade balances mechanical properties, cost, and manufacturability to prevent loose core handles. While high-strength engineering plastics offer excellent fit retention, they can be costly and difficult to process. We recommend testing a 30% glass-filled nylon grade, which provides a flexural strength of 95 MPa (well above the minimum 80 MPa needed for long-term fit) and good dimensional stability. This grade also has low shrinkage rates (0.3-0.5%), reducing the risk of inner bore deformation during cooling. To improve flow during injection without compromising strength, we can add a small amount of internal lubricant (0.5-1% by weight) to the resin, which reduces internal stress and warpage. We’ll provide material test samples for you to evaluate, ensuring that the selected grade meets your quality and cost requirements.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/why-core-tool-handles-become-loose-during-oem-production.html#suggestedAnswer-10",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-22T14:14:41Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/michael.html"}          }
                  ]
              }
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
          {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Custom Manufacturing Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/oem-odm/"}          ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "Why Do Core Tool Handles Develop Looseness During OEM Production?"}
      ]
    }
]
```