---
title: "What causes fatigue cracks in injection molded power tool handles?"
description: "An NPI engineer faces fatigue cracks in glass-filled nylon tool handles during validation. A manufacturing analysis isolates root causes in material, mold design, or process, providing actionable diagnostic steps and corrective actions to prevent production delays."
url: "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html"
language: "en"
type: "Q&A"
category: "Injection Molding Q&A"
datePublished: "2026-10-15"
dateModified: "2026-10-15"
brand: "OK TOOL"
manufacturer: "OK TOOL"
answerCount: 8
---

# What causes fatigue cracks in injection molded power tool handles?

## Question

 I'm leading the NPI for a new heavy-duty impact driver handle, and we're hitting a critical wall during pre-production validation. The handle is a complex, two-shot part: a rigid core of 30% glass-filled PA6 for structural integrity, overmolded with a soft TPE for grip. Our durability testing simulates real-world abuse, including a proprietary high-frequency vibration test. After the third trial run, we're seeing the same failure mode: hairline cracks propagating from the base of the internal metal insert cavities after just a few hundred cycles. This is a major reliability red flag. The mold has a hot runner system and eight side-actions. We've tweaked packing pressure, melt temperature, and cooling time, but the cracks persist, albeit sometimes in slightly different locations. The material supplier insists the grade is correct for power tools. My management is pressing for a go/no-go decision. From a manufacturing standpoint, is this likely a material selection problem, a mold design flaw, or a process window issue? What specific diagnostic steps and data should I request from the molding supplier to isolate the root cause and define a fix without completely redesigning the part? 

## Answers
                            
### Answer 1 — Best Answer

The fatigue cracks emerging near metal insert cavities in your glass-filled nylon handle during vibration testing are a critical failure mode that must be resolved before production. From a manufacturing standpoint, the root cause typically sits at the intersection of material behavior, part geometry, and processing conditions. The core difference in troubleshooting lies in identifying which factor is the primary stress amplifier: the brittle nature of the fiber-matrix interface under cyclic load, the geometric stress concentrators designed into the part, or the internal stresses locked in during molding.

Material-related failures in glass-reinforced polymers often stem from degraded fiber length or poor fiber-matrix adhesion. If the injection screw speed is too high or the barrel temperature too low, the glass fibers can be mechanically broken, reducing their reinforcing effect and creating microscopic defects that initiate cracks. Furthermore, if the material has absorbed moisture before processing (a common issue with nylon), it can lead to hydrolytic degradation, embrittling the polymer. The applicable scenario for a material root cause is when failures are random across the part surface and correlate with changes in material lot or pre-drying procedures.

Mold design flaws are the most common culprit for consistent, location-specific cracks in structural components. The base of a metal insert cavity is a classic stress riser. If the transition radius is too sharp (e.g., less than 0.8mm for a typical boss), it creates a notch effect that concentrates stress under vibration, far exceeding the material's endurance limit. The placement of gates and weld lines is equally critical. A weld line formed in this high-stress area is inherently weak, as fibers do not bridge the knit line. The scenario pointing to mold design is when cracks originate at the exact same geometric feature on every part, regardless of moderate process adjustments.

Process-induced cracks are subtler. Excessive packing pressure, while intended to reduce sink, can over-compress the polymer chains around the insert, creating significant residual tensile stress as the part cools and shrinks away from the metal. This residual stress adds to the operational stress from vibration, causing premature failure. Low melt temperature can also prevent proper fiber wet-out and bonding. The key indicator of a process issue is variability in failure location or cycle count when parameters are changed, or the presence of other defects like sinks or voids near the crack area.

For your specific case with a two-shot mold and repeated failures, a systematic diagnostic approach is required. First, immediately request from your molding supplier the following data: 1) A dimensional analysis report of the failed area, specifically measuring the actual fillet radii at the base of the insert pockets from several sampled parts. 2) High-magnification micrographs (50x or higher) of the fracture surface to examine fiber pull-out versus brittle fracture. 3) The complete process parameter set (melt temp, injection speed profile, pack pressure/time, cooling time) for the last three trial runs, noting any correlations with failure severity.

Based on this data, corrective actions follow a hierarchy. If radii are insufficient, a **mold modification to increase the fillet to at least 1.0mm is non-negotiable**. This may require removing the insert and re-machining the pocket, but it is a permanent solution. If the issue is a weld line, relocating the gate or adding a flow leader might be possible, though more complex. For process issues, initiate a **structured DoE (Design of Experiment) to find the optimal balance between fill speed, pack pressure, and cooling**. Often, a lower injection speed with higher melt temperature improves fiber orientation and reduces residual stress. As a last resort, material substitution to a less brittle, impact-modified nylon or a different reinforcement like mineral-filled PP can be evaluated, but this requires full re-validation of mechanical and thermal properties.

From a project coordination perspective, halt any further trial runs until the diagnostic data is reviewed. The cost of a weeks-long delay for a mold fix is trivial compared to the risk of mass-producing a handle prone to field failure. A competent manufacturing partner should be able to provide this forensic analysis and propose a concrete, evidence-based correction plan, aligning with your NPI timeline to make an informed go/no-go decision.

**status:** accepted
**Author:** Rachel Huang
**Date:** 2026-10-15

### Answer 2

Beyond the immediate crack failure, we must evaluate the handle's performance in the end-user's hands. Vibration testing is one axis, but real-world abuse includes accidental drops, exposure to oils and solvents, and thermal cycling from storage in a cold truck to use in a hot job site.

If the crack compromises the structural core, it could lead to handle separation under high torque, a serious safety risk. Before finalizing any fix, validate the corrected design against a broader test protocol: a minimum 1,000-cycle vibration test per relevant standard (e.g., ISO 28927), a series of drop tests from 1.5 meters onto concrete at multiple angles, and a thermal shock test.

Furthermore, assess the ergonomic impact. Any mold modification to add radii or change wall thickness must not adversely affect the grip contour or the overmold bonding. The final validation should include assembly of the handle to the drill motor and a user panel for grip comfort feedback over extended use.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Sophia Wang
**Date:** 2026-10-15

### Answer 3

This issue directly threatens your critical path. The immediate action is to formalize a containment plan with your supplier: pause all further trial runs and schedule a joint review of the diagnostic data within 48 hours. You need a clear decision tree: if the root cause is mold geometry, request a formal quote and timeline for the modification (e.g., EDM to increase radii).

If it's process-related, agree on a capped number of additional DoE shots. Any change must be documented with a revised sample submission and sign-off procedure. Communicate transparently with your internal stakeholders about the potential delay; a 4-week slip for a mold fix is preferable to an indefinite hold later.

Ensure the supplier's corrective action plan includes a risk assessment for introducing new defects during the modification. Finally, update your production ramp-up schedule with buffer time for a final validation run with the modified tool or optimized process before releasing work orders.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Daniel Yang
**Date:** 2026-10-15

### Answer 4

The crack at the insert base is a textbook DFM oversight. The primary suspect is an inadequate fillet radius, but the gate location is equally critical. If the gate feeds the part in a way that causes the flow front to split and rejoin around the insert, a weld line is formed at the exact point of highest stress.

Analyzing the fill pattern through simulation is essential. A solution might involve relocating the gate to a less critical area or changing from a single gate to multiple gates to control weld line placement.

Additionally, the cooling layout around the boss must be efficient and symmetrical to prevent differential shrinkage that pulls on the already stressed area. If modification is needed, prioritize increasing the radius and consider adding a slight draft to the insert pocket walls to ease ejection and reduce stress during demolding.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Amy Li
**Date:** 2026-10-15

### Answer 5

Focusing on the process, the key parameters influencing fatigue resistance in glass-filled materials are melt temperature, injection speed, and packing pressure profile. A melt temperature at the upper end of the material's recommended range (e.g., 285-295°C for PA6-GF30) ensures better fiber wet-out and reduces viscosity for more laminar flow. High injection speed tends to orient fibers perpendicular to the flow, which can be detrimental around bosses. A slower fill speed (e.g., 40-60% of machine capacity) promotes more random fiber orientation, improving toughness.

For packing, use a moderate pressure (e.g., 60% of injection pressure) applied for a longer time to compensate for shrinkage without over-packing the boss area. Record cavity pressure data if available; a sudden pressure spike at the end of fill indicates the cavity is over-packed. Optimize these parameters through a DoE, measuring not just cracks but also part weight and dimensions for stability.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Olivia Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-15

### Answer 6

The durability of the mold itself can be a factor. For a part requiring high structural integrity, the mold cavities and cores should be made from a hardened steel like H13 or S136, polished to a fine finish to minimize friction during ejection, which can induce stress. Inspect the specific insert pocket for any signs of wear, micro-cracking, or improper polishing that could be transferring a surface imperfection to the plastic part.

Furthermore, ensure the insert is properly supported and secured in the mold; any minute movement during injection can cause variations in wall thickness and stress. A maintenance check should verify the alignment of side-actions and the integrity of cooling channels serving that area, as inconsistent cooling will create residual stress.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Michael Wu
**Date:** 2026-10-15

### Answer 7

If a mold modification is required to enlarge the fillet radius, the machining strategy is crucial. The existing pocket likely needs to be enlarged via EDM (Electrical Discharge Machining) to achieve the new, larger radius without affecting the surrounding geometry.

The key is to achieve a smooth, burr-free transition with a consistent surface finish. Any tooling marks or sharp edges left from machining will become stress concentrators themselves.

The machinist must use a precision ball-nose end mill or EDM electrode with a controlled step-over to ensure the new radius is accurately formed to the specified dimension (e.g., 1.0mm ±0.05mm). After machining, a meticulous polishing process is required to restore a mirror-like finish to the cavity surface, which aids in part release and reduces the risk of surface defects initiating cracks.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Jason Zhou
**Date:** 2026-10-15

### Answer 8

For mass production consistency, the optimized process window must be translated into robust machine settings and inline quality checks. Once the root cause is fixed, document the master process parameters and establish upper and lower control limits for critical ones like melt temperature and cushion size.

On the production line, consider implementing an automated vision system or laser measurement to periodically check the critical radius area on sampled parts for any visual flaws or dimensional drift. Additionally, design the work cell for efficient handling of the metal inserts and the two-shot process to minimize cycle time.

The ejection system must be smooth to avoid bending the delicate part upon demolding. Finally, establish a statistical process control (SPC) chart for part weight, as a consistent weight is a good indicator of a stable packing phase, which directly relates to residual stress control.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Linda Xu
**Date:** 2026-10-15

## Related Resources

- [Injection Molding Q&A](https://www.jaterson.com/qa/injection-molding/)
- [Plastic Injection Molding](https://www.jaterson.com/capabilities/plastic-injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Guide](https://www.jaterson.com/manufacturing/injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Buying Guides](https://www.jaterson.com/buying/injection-molding/)
- [Products](https://www.jaterson.com/products/)
- [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.jaterson.com/custom-manufacturing/)
- [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.jaterson.com/knowledge/)
- [Injection Molding](https://www.jaterson.com/knowledge/injection-molding/)

## Structured Data

```json
[
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "QAPage",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What causes fatigue cracks in injection molded power tool handles?",
        "text": "I'm leading the NPI for a new heavy-duty impact driver handle, and we're hitting a critical wall during pre-production validation. The handle is a complex, two-shot part: a rigid core of 30% glass-filled PA6 for structural integrity, overmolded with a soft TPE for grip. Our durability testing simulates real-world abuse, including a proprietary high-frequency vibration test. After the third trial run, we're seeing the same failure mode: hairline cracks propagating from the base of the internal metal insert cavities after just a few hundred cycles. This is a major reliability red flag. The mold has a hot runner system and eight side-actions. We've tweaked packing pressure, melt temperature, and cooling time, but the cracks persist, albeit sometimes in slightly different locations. The material supplier insists the grade is correct for power tools. My management is pressing for a go/no-go decision. From a manufacturing standpoint, is this likely a material selection problem, a mold design flaw, or a process window issue? What specific diagnostic steps and data should I request from the molding supplier to isolate the root cause and define a fix without completely redesigning the part?",
        "answerCount": 8,
        "upvoteCount": 10,
        "datePublished": "2026-10-15T19:33:29Z",
        "dateModified": "2026-10-15T19:36:28Z",
        "author": {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Anonymous",
          "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html"
        }
                ,"acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The fatigue cracks emerging near metal insert cavities in your glass-filled nylon handle during vibration testing are a critical failure mode that must be resolved before production. From a manufacturing standpoint, the root cause typically sits at the intersection of material behavior, part geometry, and processing conditions. The core difference in troubleshooting lies in identifying which factor is the primary stress amplifier: the brittle nature of the fiber-matrix interface under cyclic load, the geometric stress concentrators designed into the part, or the internal stresses locked in during molding. Material-related failures in glass-reinforced polymers often stem from degraded fiber length or poor fiber-matrix adhesion. If the injection screw speed is too high or the barrel temperature too low, the glass fibers can be mechanically broken, reducing their reinforcing effect and creating microscopic defects that initiate cracks. Furthermore, if the material has absorbed moisture before processing (a common issue with nylon), it can lead to hydrolytic degradation, embrittling the polymer. The applicable scenario for a material root cause is when failures are random across the part surface and correlate with changes in material lot or pre-drying procedures. Mold design flaws are the most common culprit for consistent, location-specific cracks in structural components. The base of a metal insert cavity is a classic stress riser. If the transition radius is too sharp (e.g., less than 0.8mm for a typical boss), it creates a notch effect that concentrates stress under vibration, far exceeding the material's endurance limit. The placement of gates and weld lines is equally critical. A weld line formed in this high-stress area is inherently weak, as fibers do not bridge the knit line. The scenario pointing to mold design is when cracks originate at the exact same geometric feature on every part, regardless of moderate process adjustments. Process-induced cracks are subtler. Excessive packing pressure, while intended to reduce sink, can over-compress the polymer chains around the insert, creating significant residual tensile stress as the part cools and shrinks away from the metal. This residual stress adds to the operational stress from vibration, causing premature failure. Low melt temperature can also prevent proper fiber wet-out and bonding. The key indicator of a process issue is variability in failure location or cycle count when parameters are changed, or the presence of other defects like sinks or voids near the crack area. For your specific case with a two-shot mold and repeated failures, a systematic diagnostic approach is required. First, immediately request from your molding supplier the following data: 1) A dimensional analysis report of the failed area, specifically measuring the actual fillet radii at the base of the insert pockets from several sampled parts. 2) High-magnification micrographs (50x or higher) of the fracture surface to examine fiber pull-out versus brittle fracture. 3) The complete process parameter set (melt temp, injection speed profile, pack pressure/time, cooling time) for the last three trial runs, noting any correlations with failure severity. Based on this data, corrective actions follow a hierarchy. If radii are insufficient, a mold modification to increase the fillet to at least 1.0mm is non-negotiable . This may require removing the insert and re-machining the pocket, but it is a permanent solution. If the issue is a weld line, relocating the gate or adding a flow leader might be possible, though more complex. For process issues, initiate a structured DoE (Design of Experiment) to find the optimal balance between fill speed, pack pressure, and cooling . Often, a lower injection speed with higher melt temperature improves fiber orientation and reduces residual stress. As a last resort, material substitution to a less brittle, impact-modified nylon or a different reinforcement like mineral-filled PP can be evaluated, but this requires full re-validation of mechanical and thermal properties. From a project coordination perspective, halt any further trial runs until the diagnostic data is reviewed. The cost of a weeks-long delay for a mold fix is trivial compared to the risk of mass-producing a handle prone to field failure. A competent manufacturing partner should be able to provide this forensic analysis and propose a concrete, evidence-based correction plan, aligning with your NPI timeline to make an informed go/no-go decision.",
            "upvoteCount": 10,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html#acceptedAnswer",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-15T21:16:10Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Rachel Huang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/rachel.html"}        }
                ,"suggestedAnswer": [
                  {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Beyond the immediate crack failure, we must evaluate the handle's performance in the end-user's hands. Vibration testing is one axis, but real-world abuse includes accidental drops, exposure to oils and solvents, and thermal cycling from storage in a cold truck to use in a hot job site. If the crack compromises the structural core, it could lead to handle separation under high torque, a serious safety risk. Before finalizing any fix, validate the corrected design against a broader test protocol: a minimum 1,000-cycle vibration test per relevant standard (e.g., ISO 28927), a series of drop tests from 1.5 meters onto concrete at multiple angles, and a thermal shock test. Furthermore, assess the ergonomic impact. Any mold modification to add radii or change wall thickness must not adversely affect the grip contour or the overmold bonding. The final validation should include assembly of the handle to the drill motor and a user panel for grip comfort feedback over extended use.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html#suggestedAnswer-2",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-15T20:54:54Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Sophia Wang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/sophia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "This issue directly threatens your critical path. The immediate action is to formalize a containment plan with your supplier: pause all further trial runs and schedule a joint review of the diagnostic data within 48 hours. You need a clear decision tree: if the root cause is mold geometry, request a formal quote and timeline for the modification (e.g., EDM to increase radii). If it's process-related, agree on a capped number of additional DoE shots. Any change must be documented with a revised sample submission and sign-off procedure. Communicate transparently with your internal stakeholders about the potential delay; a 4-week slip for a mold fix is preferable to an indefinite hold later. Ensure the supplier's corrective action plan includes a risk assessment for introducing new defects during the modification. Finally, update your production ramp-up schedule with buffer time for a final validation run with the modified tool or optimized process before releasing work orders.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html#suggestedAnswer-3",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-15T20:53:19Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/daniel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The crack at the insert base is a textbook DFM oversight. The primary suspect is an inadequate fillet radius, but the gate location is equally critical. If the gate feeds the part in a way that causes the flow front to split and rejoin around the insert, a weld line is formed at the exact point of highest stress. Analyzing the fill pattern through simulation is essential. A solution might involve relocating the gate to a less critical area or changing from a single gate to multiple gates to control weld line placement. Additionally, the cooling layout around the boss must be efficient and symmetrical to prevent differential shrinkage that pulls on the already stressed area. If modification is needed, prioritize increasing the radius and consider adding a slight draft to the insert pocket walls to ease ejection and reduce stress during demolding.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html#suggestedAnswer-4",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-15T20:48:15Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Amy Li","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/amy.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Focusing on the process, the key parameters influencing fatigue resistance in glass-filled materials are melt temperature, injection speed, and packing pressure profile. A melt temperature at the upper end of the material's recommended range (e.g., 285-295°C for PA6-GF30) ensures better fiber wet-out and reduces viscosity for more laminar flow. High injection speed tends to orient fibers perpendicular to the flow, which can be detrimental around bosses. A slower fill speed (e.g., 40-60% of machine capacity) promotes more random fiber orientation, improving toughness. For packing, use a moderate pressure (e.g., 60% of injection pressure) applied for a longer time to compensate for shrinkage without over-packing the boss area. Record cavity pressure data if available; a sudden pressure spike at the end of fill indicates the cavity is over-packed. Optimize these parameters through a DoE, measuring not just cracks but also part weight and dimensions for stability.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html#suggestedAnswer-5",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-15T19:41:10Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Olivia Chen","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/olivia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The durability of the mold itself can be a factor. For a part requiring high structural integrity, the mold cavities and cores should be made from a hardened steel like H13 or S136, polished to a fine finish to minimize friction during ejection, which can induce stress. Inspect the specific insert pocket for any signs of wear, micro-cracking, or improper polishing that could be transferring a surface imperfection to the plastic part. Furthermore, ensure the insert is properly supported and secured in the mold; any minute movement during injection can cause variations in wall thickness and stress. A maintenance check should verify the alignment of side-actions and the integrity of cooling channels serving that area, as inconsistent cooling will create residual stress.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html#suggestedAnswer-6",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-15T19:39:02Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/michael.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "If a mold modification is required to enlarge the fillet radius, the machining strategy is crucial. The existing pocket likely needs to be enlarged via EDM (Electrical Discharge Machining) to achieve the new, larger radius without affecting the surrounding geometry. The key is to achieve a smooth, burr-free transition with a consistent surface finish. Any tooling marks or sharp edges left from machining will become stress concentrators themselves. The machinist must use a precision ball-nose end mill or EDM electrode with a controlled step-over to ensure the new radius is accurately formed to the specified dimension (e.g., 1.0mm ±0.05mm). After machining, a meticulous polishing process is required to restore a mirror-like finish to the cavity surface, which aids in part release and reduces the risk of surface defects initiating cracks.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html#suggestedAnswer-7",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-15T19:37:58Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Jason Zhou","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/jason.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "For mass production consistency, the optimized process window must be translated into robust machine settings and inline quality checks. Once the root cause is fixed, document the master process parameters and establish upper and lower control limits for critical ones like melt temperature and cushion size. On the production line, consider implementing an automated vision system or laser measurement to periodically check the critical radius area on sampled parts for any visual flaws or dimensional drift. Additionally, design the work cell for efficient handling of the metal inserts and the two-shot process to minimize cycle time. The ejection system must be smooth to avoid bending the delicate part upon demolding. Finally, establish a statistical process control (SPC) chart for part weight, as a consistent weight is a good indicator of a stable packing phase, which directly relates to residual stress control.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/what-causes-fatigue-cracks-injection-molded-power-tool-handles.html#suggestedAnswer-8",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-15T19:36:28Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Linda Xu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/linda.html"}          }
                  ]
              }
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
          {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Injection Molding Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/injection-molding/"}          ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "What causes fatigue cracks in injection molded power tool handles?"}
      ]
    }
]
```