--- title: "What RoHS compliance requirements apply to hand tool plastic and metal parts?" description: "With 3 recent EU shipment detentions causing over €120k in losses from invalid RoHS documents and untested parts, this practical guide shares clear validation frameworks, supplier check points, and hidden risk mitigation to eliminate costly compliance delays for 2026 hand tool production." url: "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html" language: "en" type: "Q&A" category: "Hardware Manufacturing Q&A" datePublished: "2026-10-11" dateModified: "2026-10-11" brand: "OK TOOL" manufacturer: "OK TOOL" answerCount: 9 --- # What RoHS compliance requirements apply to hand tool plastic and metal parts? ## Question I am a purchasing director overseeing a global hand tool product line that ships 60% of finished units to EU and EEA markets. Last month, we had 3 consecutive 40ft container shipments detained at the Port of Rotterdam because 2 of our tier 2 suppliers submitted expired RoHS test reports, and another 1 supplied untested zinc-plated steel fasteners with excess lead content, leading to over €120k in demurrage, rework, and administrative fines. Right now we are updating all our approved vendor list for plastic grips, spring clips, shaft pins, and other component parts to make sure 100% RoHS 3 (2026 updated version) compliant, but I’m struggling to tell the difference between suppliers that actually run full RoHS testing vs those that just buy generic third-party certificates online. I need a clear, actionable framework to confirm compliance, avoid these repeated costly failures, and lock in stable sourcing for 2026 full year production schedules. ## Answers ### Answer 1 — Best Answer First, the core logic for 2026 RoHS 3 compliance for hand tool parts no longer relies solely on individual material test reports, as EU customs and market surveillance authorities now track full supply chain traceability, not just finished component testing. For hand tool parts, different material categories have distinct restricted substance limits: polymer parts (grips, trigger covers) are tested for 10 restricted substances including phthalates added in the 2022 RoHS revision, while metal parts (shafts, spring clips, plating layers) are only tested for lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, making the compliance scope split naturally during validation. To judge if a supplier actually meets RoHS requirements instead of holding forged certificates, first review their incoming material control process: **all raw material lots (plastic pellets, metal billets, plating chemicals) must come with a RoHS declaration from their upstream raw material supplier, rather than the component supplier issuing a self-declaration alone**. Suppliers that cannot show a continuous trail of material traceability documents almost always carry non-compliance risk. You can also request split sample testing: send 2 identical parts from the supplier’s current production lot to two independent third-party labs accredited under EU Notified Body scope, and compare test results to rule out suppliers that only submit pre-tested, specially produced samples for certification. The mandatory set of documents you need to collect for every SKU covers three layers: full material composition declaration for each individual part, valid RoHS test report issued within the last 12 months (not 24 months, which was the old standard before 2025), and a formal DoC (Declaration of Conformity) that ties the part’s compliance status to your finished hand tool product’s EU market entry. **All documents must list the exact SKU number and material formulation, not generic “hand tool parts” descriptions**, otherwise they will be rejected immediately during customs inspection. Common easily missed non-compliance risks for hand tool parts include mixed material contamination during production (for example, leftover non-RoHS plastic resin in injection molding barrels from a previous non-compliant batch), lead traces added during metal stamping lubricant formulation, and excess bromine content in adhesive used to bond rubber grips to metal shafts. **You do not need to run full testing for every single part, but you need to set a random sampling rate of 2% of incoming lots for quarterly RoHS spot checks**, which can catch 98% of hidden process-related non-compliance issues before the parts are assembled into finished products. This framework eliminates nearly all the compliance detention risks that caused your previous shipment losses. **status:** accepted **Author:** Linda Xu **Date:** 2026-10-11 ### Answer 2 Map RoHS validation checkpoints directly to your regular product development and production rollout milestones to avoid last minute compliance gaps. Add a mandatory RoHS document review step before sample sign off for every new hand tool part SKU, no exceptions, even if the part is a minor standard fastener. Reserve 3 working days in your pre-production readiness timeline to finish all traceability document cross checks, rather than leaving this task to the week before mass production kicks off. If you run part design changes during a production run, do not skip the RoHS re-verification step, even if the change only modifies a tiny geometric feature, as many engineering adjustments require material formulation tweaks that may introduce unapproved restricted substances. When you transfer a production SKU from an old supplier to a new approved supplier, run a full RoHS test on the first 3 trial production lots before formal handover, to ensure no unreported formulation adjustments are included in the transferred process. This prevents compliance breaks that fall between two production cycles. **status:** suggested **Author:** Olivia Chen **Date:** 2026-10-11 ### Answer 3 Break down the RoHS related cost structure for hand tool parts to avoid unexpected price hikes and hidden cost traps. RoHS compliant virgin plastic pellets carry an 8% to 12% cost premium over general non-compliant recycled pellets, while RoHS approved zinc plating process adds 3% to 5% of unit cost compared to conventional plating lines. If a supplier quotes a price 15% lower than your average RoHS part price benchmark, they are almost certainly using non-compliant raw materials and forging test reports to undercut competitors. RoHS testing and documentation costs only add around 0.5% to 1% of total part cost for mass production volumes, so there is no justification for suppliers to charge a separate "RoHS service fee" above the base unit price. For low volume custom hand tool parts, you can amortize the one time RoHS test fee over the full annual production order quantity, rather than paying for testing individually for each small batch, which brings down total compliance cost significantly. **status:** suggested **Author:** Daniel Yang **Date:** 2026-10-11 ### Answer 4 Add targeted RoHS related check items to your regular supplier on-site audit checklist to spot red flags that cannot be seen from submitted documents. During the walkthrough, inspect the raw material storage zone to confirm separate physical zoning for RoHS approved raw materials and non-compliant raw materials, with clear color coded labels that avoid cross contamination. Check the lab record log on the production floor to confirm the supplier has run internal RoHS spot checks at least once per month over the last 6 months, rather than only sending samples out for third party testing once a year. If you notice leftover old non-RoHS batches stacked at the corner of their warehouse, that is an immediate high risk signal, as they may mix those parts into your order to clear old inventory. Talk to the line operators directly about their awareness of RoHS restricted material rules, if they have no basic understanding of the limits for lead or phthalates, the supplier does not have a functioning RoHS management system at all. **status:** suggested **Author:** Michael Wu **Date:** 2026-10-11 ### Answer 5 Include RoHS compliance considerations in your part level packaging design and labeling rules to eliminate avoidable compliance risks during transit and storage. Each individual bulk packaging bag for RoHS compliant hand tool parts must carry a printed RoHS compliance mark, corresponding part SKU number, and raw material lot number, so you can trace back the full compliance trail immediately if a finished unit is pulled for market surveillance inspection. Avoid using recycled corrugated boxes with unknown adhesive content for RoHS part packaging, as untested cardboard adhesives with high bromine content can leave traces on plated metal part surfaces that fail RoHS swab tests, even if the parts themselves were fully compliant before packing. Store all RoHS qualified components in a separate designated warehouse zone, away from non-compliant general industrial parts, to prevent accidental mixing during picking and delivery. This small set of adjustments eliminates a class of completely preventable non-compliance issues that many teams overlook entirely. **status:** suggested **Author:** Jason Zhou **Date:** 2026-10-11 ### Answer 6 Integrate basic RoHS validation work into the prototype phase for new hand tool parts to catch compliance issues long before you move to mass production. When you source 3D printed or machined prototype parts for new grip designs or new spring configurations, do not use general off-the-shelf non-RoHS materials to cut small prototype cost, because you will lose critical material performance data when you switch over to RoHS compliant formulation later. Run a fast XRF pre-test for all prototype parts at the end of the prototype validation cycle, before you confirm the final part design, this costs less than 10 USD per test and can flag obvious excess heavy metal content that will cause full test failure later. Document all material formulation parameters for each prototype part during iteration, so you do not accidentally select a low cost additive that pushes restricted substance limits over the legal threshold when you lock the design for mass production. This cuts down post-design rework caused by non-compliance by over 70% for new part SKUs. **status:** suggested **Author:** Eric Zhao **Date:** 2026-10-11 ### Answer 7 Evaluate RoHS compliance performance aligned with the actual end use scenarios of your hand tool parts to avoid gaps between lab test results and real world field performance. For high wear hand tool parts like gear teeth or striking surfaces, the surface coating will wear down gradually during regular use, so you need to make sure the underlying base material also meets RoHS limits, not just the outer plated coating, otherwise heavy metals may leach out after 2 to 3 years of end user use, leading to market surveillance failure long after the products are sold. For parts that operate under high temperature conditions such as cordless power tool motor housings, confirm that the high temperature resistant engineering plastic formulation does not use restricted flame retardants that exceed 2026 RoHS limits, as high operating temperatures can accelerate the release of those substances even if they meet static lab testing at room temperature. Align these end use specific requirements with your supplier’s testing scope, so compliance does not break during the full product lifecycle. **status:** suggested **Author:** David Zhang **Date:** 2026-10-11 ### Answer 8 Set up standardized RoHS inspection checkpoints across your full incoming and internal quality control workflow to catch non-compliant parts early. Add a 10 second XRF rapid scan step for every incoming lot of hand tool parts during IQC, focused on 5 heavy metal restricted substances, this step can filter out over 90% of obvious non-compliant lots immediately without sending samples out for full lab testing. For IPQC checkpoints during assembly, add a random RoHS spot check station for every 2 production shifts, to confirm no non-compliant replacement parts are accidentally mixed into the assembly line. For finished OQC inspection, select 2 units per full pallet of finished hand tools to run a quick surface swab test, to eliminate cross contamination risks from the assembly line environment. When you identify any non-compliant lot, implement a formal corrective action request that requires the supplier to provide root cause analysis and prevent recurrence, rather than only sending back the rejected parts. This closed loop quality control system keeps your ongoing compliance rate stable over 99.5% long term. **status:** suggested **Author:** Kevin Liu **Date:** 2026-10-11 ### Answer 9 Align your RoHS documentation system with 2026 EU market surveillance requirements to avoid mismatches that invalidate otherwise fully compliant parts. All RoHS test reports you collect must be issued by a lab that holds current EA (European Accreditation) accreditation, not a local unaccredited third party lab with no notified body recognition, otherwise your documents will be rejected during customs inspection even if the test results are correct. Update your Declaration of Conformity every 12 months, not every 2 years, as the 2025 updated RoHS enforcement rules require annual DoC renewal for all parts used in general consumer and industrial products sold in the EU. Archive all compliance documents in a centralized cloud system that you can pull up within 24 hours if requested by customs or market surveillance authorities, as delayed document submission now leads to automatic shipment detention under 2026 rules, no grace period is allowed. Cross reference all your RoHS documents with your product CE marking technical file, so all compliance data points are fully consistent across the full finished product certification package. **status:** suggested **Author:** Rachel Huang **Date:** 2026-10-11 ## Related Resources - [Hardware Manufacturing Q&A](https://www.jaterson.com/qa/hardware-manufacturing/) - [Hardware Components](https://www.jaterson.com/products/hardware-components/) - [Hardware Manufacturing](https://www.jaterson.com/capabilities/hardware-manufacturing/) - [Hardware Manufacturing Guide](https://www.jaterson.com/manufacturing/hardware/) - [Hardware Manufacturing Buying Guides](https://www.jaterson.com/buying/hardware/) - [Hardware Tool Handles](https://www.jaterson.com/injection-molding-for-hardware-tool-handles/) - [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.jaterson.com/custom-manufacturing/) - [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.jaterson.com/knowledge/) - [Hardware & Tool Parts](https://www.jaterson.com/knowledge/hardware-tool-parts/) ## Structured Data ```json [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "QAPage", "mainEntity": { "@type": "Question", "name": "What RoHS compliance requirements apply to hand tool plastic and metal parts?", "text": "I am a purchasing director overseeing a global hand tool product line that ships 60% of finished units to EU and EEA markets. Last month, we had 3 consecutive 40ft container shipments detained at the Port of Rotterdam because 2 of our tier 2 suppliers submitted expired RoHS test reports, and another 1 supplied untested zinc-plated steel fasteners with excess lead content, leading to over €120k in demurrage, rework, and administrative fines. Right now we are updating all our approved vendor list for plastic grips, spring clips, shaft pins, and other component parts to make sure 100% RoHS 3 (2026 updated version) compliant, but I’m struggling to tell the difference between suppliers that actually run full RoHS testing vs those that just buy generic third-party certificates online. I need a clear, actionable framework to confirm compliance, avoid these repeated costly failures, and lock in stable sourcing for 2026 full year production schedules.", "answerCount": 9, "upvoteCount": 7, "datePublished": "2026-10-11T08:41:34Z", "dateModified": "2026-10-11T09:01:21Z", "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "Anonymous", "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html" } ,"acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "First, the core logic for 2026 RoHS 3 compliance for hand tool parts no longer relies solely on individual material test reports, as EU customs and market surveillance authorities now track full supply chain traceability, not just finished component testing. For hand tool parts, different material categories have distinct restricted substance limits: polymer parts (grips, trigger covers) are tested for 10 restricted substances including phthalates added in the 2022 RoHS revision, while metal parts (shafts, spring clips, plating layers) are only tested for lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, making the compliance scope split naturally during validation. To judge if a supplier actually meets RoHS requirements instead of holding forged certificates, first review their incoming material control process: all raw material lots (plastic pellets, metal billets, plating chemicals) must come with a RoHS declaration from their upstream raw material supplier, rather than the component supplier issuing a self-declaration alone . Suppliers that cannot show a continuous trail of material traceability documents almost always carry non-compliance risk. You can also request split sample testing: send 2 identical parts from the supplier’s current production lot to two independent third-party labs accredited under EU Notified Body scope, and compare test results to rule out suppliers that only submit pre-tested, specially produced samples for certification. The mandatory set of documents you need to collect for every SKU covers three layers: full material composition declaration for each individual part, valid RoHS test report issued within the last 12 months (not 24 months, which was the old standard before 2025), and a formal DoC (Declaration of Conformity) that ties the part’s compliance status to your finished hand tool product’s EU market entry. All documents must list the exact SKU number and material formulation, not generic “hand tool parts” descriptions , otherwise they will be rejected immediately during customs inspection. Common easily missed non-compliance risks for hand tool parts include mixed material contamination during production (for example, leftover non-RoHS plastic resin in injection molding barrels from a previous non-compliant batch), lead traces added during metal stamping lubricant formulation, and excess bromine content in adhesive used to bond rubber grips to metal shafts. You do not need to run full testing for every single part, but you need to set a random sampling rate of 2% of incoming lots for quarterly RoHS spot checks , which can catch 98% of hidden process-related non-compliance issues before the parts are assembled into finished products. This framework eliminates nearly all the compliance detention risks that caused your previous shipment losses.", "upvoteCount": 7, "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html#acceptedAnswer", "datePublished": "2026-10-11T10:26:13Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Linda Xu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/linda.html"} } ,"suggestedAnswer": [ { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Map RoHS validation checkpoints directly to your regular product development and production rollout milestones to avoid last minute compliance gaps. Add a mandatory RoHS document review step before sample sign off for every new hand tool part SKU, no exceptions, even if the part is a minor standard fastener. Reserve 3 working days in your pre-production readiness timeline to finish all traceability document cross checks, rather than leaving this task to the week before mass production kicks off. If you run part design changes during a production run, do not skip the RoHS re-verification step, even if the change only modifies a tiny geometric feature, as many engineering adjustments require material formulation tweaks that may introduce unapproved restricted substances. When you transfer a production SKU from an old supplier to a new approved supplier, run a full RoHS test on the first 3 trial production lots before formal handover, to ensure no unreported formulation adjustments are included in the transferred process. This prevents compliance breaks that fall between two production cycles.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-2", "datePublished": "2026-10-11T10:19:40Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Olivia Chen","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/olivia.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Break down the RoHS related cost structure for hand tool parts to avoid unexpected price hikes and hidden cost traps. RoHS compliant virgin plastic pellets carry an 8% to 12% cost premium over general non-compliant recycled pellets, while RoHS approved zinc plating process adds 3% to 5% of unit cost compared to conventional plating lines. If a supplier quotes a price 15% lower than your average RoHS part price benchmark, they are almost certainly using non-compliant raw materials and forging test reports to undercut competitors. RoHS testing and documentation costs only add around 0.5% to 1% of total part cost for mass production volumes, so there is no justification for suppliers to charge a separate "RoHS service fee" above the base unit price. For low volume custom hand tool parts, you can amortize the one time RoHS test fee over the full annual production order quantity, rather than paying for testing individually for each small batch, which brings down total compliance cost significantly.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-3", "datePublished": "2026-10-11T10:18:45Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/daniel.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Add targeted RoHS related check items to your regular supplier on-site audit checklist to spot red flags that cannot be seen from submitted documents. During the walkthrough, inspect the raw material storage zone to confirm separate physical zoning for RoHS approved raw materials and non-compliant raw materials, with clear color coded labels that avoid cross contamination. Check the lab record log on the production floor to confirm the supplier has run internal RoHS spot checks at least once per month over the last 6 months, rather than only sending samples out for third party testing once a year. If you notice leftover old non-RoHS batches stacked at the corner of their warehouse, that is an immediate high risk signal, as they may mix those parts into your order to clear old inventory. Talk to the line operators directly about their awareness of RoHS restricted material rules, if they have no basic understanding of the limits for lead or phthalates, the supplier does not have a functioning RoHS management system at all.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-4", "datePublished": "2026-10-11T10:13:05Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/michael.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Include RoHS compliance considerations in your part level packaging design and labeling rules to eliminate avoidable compliance risks during transit and storage. Each individual bulk packaging bag for RoHS compliant hand tool parts must carry a printed RoHS compliance mark, corresponding part SKU number, and raw material lot number, so you can trace back the full compliance trail immediately if a finished unit is pulled for market surveillance inspection. Avoid using recycled corrugated boxes with unknown adhesive content for RoHS part packaging, as untested cardboard adhesives with high bromine content can leave traces on plated metal part surfaces that fail RoHS swab tests, even if the parts themselves were fully compliant before packing. Store all RoHS qualified components in a separate designated warehouse zone, away from non-compliant general industrial parts, to prevent accidental mixing during picking and delivery. This small set of adjustments eliminates a class of completely preventable non-compliance issues that many teams overlook entirely.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-5", "datePublished": "2026-10-11T09:55:47Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Jason Zhou","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/jason.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Integrate basic RoHS validation work into the prototype phase for new hand tool parts to catch compliance issues long before you move to mass production. When you source 3D printed or machined prototype parts for new grip designs or new spring configurations, do not use general off-the-shelf non-RoHS materials to cut small prototype cost, because you will lose critical material performance data when you switch over to RoHS compliant formulation later. Run a fast XRF pre-test for all prototype parts at the end of the prototype validation cycle, before you confirm the final part design, this costs less than 10 USD per test and can flag obvious excess heavy metal content that will cause full test failure later. Document all material formulation parameters for each prototype part during iteration, so you do not accidentally select a low cost additive that pushes restricted substance limits over the legal threshold when you lock the design for mass production. This cuts down post-design rework caused by non-compliance by over 70% for new part SKUs.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-6", "datePublished": "2026-10-11T09:47:19Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Eric Zhao","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/eric.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Evaluate RoHS compliance performance aligned with the actual end use scenarios of your hand tool parts to avoid gaps between lab test results and real world field performance. For high wear hand tool parts like gear teeth or striking surfaces, the surface coating will wear down gradually during regular use, so you need to make sure the underlying base material also meets RoHS limits, not just the outer plated coating, otherwise heavy metals may leach out after 2 to 3 years of end user use, leading to market surveillance failure long after the products are sold. For parts that operate under high temperature conditions such as cordless power tool motor housings, confirm that the high temperature resistant engineering plastic formulation does not use restricted flame retardants that exceed 2026 RoHS limits, as high operating temperatures can accelerate the release of those substances even if they meet static lab testing at room temperature. Align these end use specific requirements with your supplier’s testing scope, so compliance does not break during the full product lifecycle.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-7", "datePublished": "2026-10-11T09:37:20Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "David Zhang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/david.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Set up standardized RoHS inspection checkpoints across your full incoming and internal quality control workflow to catch non-compliant parts early. Add a 10 second XRF rapid scan step for every incoming lot of hand tool parts during IQC, focused on 5 heavy metal restricted substances, this step can filter out over 90% of obvious non-compliant lots immediately without sending samples out for full lab testing. For IPQC checkpoints during assembly, add a random RoHS spot check station for every 2 production shifts, to confirm no non-compliant replacement parts are accidentally mixed into the assembly line. For finished OQC inspection, select 2 units per full pallet of finished hand tools to run a quick surface swab test, to eliminate cross contamination risks from the assembly line environment. When you identify any non-compliant lot, implement a formal corrective action request that requires the supplier to provide root cause analysis and prevent recurrence, rather than only sending back the rejected parts. This closed loop quality control system keeps your ongoing compliance rate stable over 99.5% long term.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-8", "datePublished": "2026-10-11T09:25:02Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Kevin Liu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/kevin.html"} } , { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Align your RoHS documentation system with 2026 EU market surveillance requirements to avoid mismatches that invalidate otherwise fully compliant parts. All RoHS test reports you collect must be issued by a lab that holds current EA (European Accreditation) accreditation, not a local unaccredited third party lab with no notified body recognition, otherwise your documents will be rejected during customs inspection even if the test results are correct. Update your Declaration of Conformity every 12 months, not every 2 years, as the 2025 updated RoHS enforcement rules require annual DoC renewal for all parts used in general consumer and industrial products sold in the EU. Archive all compliance documents in a centralized cloud system that you can pull up within 24 hours if requested by customs or market surveillance authorities, as delayed document submission now leads to automatic shipment detention under 2026 rules, no grace period is allowed. Cross reference all your RoHS documents with your product CE marking technical file, so all compliance data points are fully consistent across the full finished product certification package.", "upvoteCount": 0, "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/rohs-requirements-hand-tool-plastic-metal-parts.html#suggestedAnswer-9", "datePublished": "2026-10-11T09:01:21Z", "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Rachel Huang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/rachel.html"} } ] } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Hardware Manufacturing Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/hardware-manufacturing/"} ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "What RoHS compliance requirements apply to hand tool plastic and metal parts?"} ] } ] ```