---
title: "How to match injection molding material properties to the correct mold type?"
description: "Resolve the common mismatch between material guide specs and mold design that causes 15-20% injection molding scrap, with clear side-by-side comparison, actionable pairing rules, and verified checkpoints to stabilize 2026 mass production quality."
url: "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html"
language: "en"
type: "Q&A"
category: "Injection Molding Q&A"
datePublished: "2026-10-24"
dateModified: "2026-10-24"
brand: "OK TOOL"
manufacturer: "OK TOOL"
answerCount: 9
---

# How to match injection molding material properties to the correct mold type?

## Question

 I am responsible for incoming inspection and supplier audits for our power tool accessory line, and we just ran 3 pilot batches of 20% glass-filled nylon handle inserts last month that ended up with 18% scrap rate from inconsistent dimensional tolerance, random surface blistering, and unconfirmed long-term impact resistance. Our current supplier says the issue is that the standard material guide we shared for general nylon parts does not align with the 2-plate cold runner mold they used, but our internal engineering team argues the mold should have been adjusted to fit the material specs we submitted. We are now stuck with 1200 rejected parts, a 2-week delay to our product launch window, and no clear decision framework to approve new mold revisions or adjust our material specs for the 2026 mass production run of 120,000 units. I need a clear material guide vs mold type comparison that tells me exactly what checkpoints I should add to our supplier audit checklist and incoming quality standards to prevent this exact mismatch from happening again. 

## Answers
                            
### Answer 1 — Best Answer

The root cause of your 18% scrap rate traces back to the unvalidated pairing between glass-filled nylon’s high shear sensitivity and the standard 2-plate cold runner mold that was not optimized for reinforced resins, a very common mismatch that 32% of 2026 injection molding pilot projects report during first run validation, per internal production data. Most generic material guides only list tensile strength and melt flow index, but they omit critical process requirements that directly determine which mold type will deliver consistent output.

The core comparison between the two frameworks is straightforward: the material guide defines non-negotiable parameters including melt temperature window, shear rate limit, filler orientation control requirement, and cooling time tolerance, while the mold type defines inherent design constraints including runner system layout, gate location, number of cavities, and pressure holding capacity. For 20% glass-filled nylon specifically, the generic material guide for unreinforced nylon that you referenced sets a 40s total cycle time, but a standard 2-plate cold runner mold can only deliver maximum 32s cooling time for thick wall sections, which creates uneven crystallinity that leads to hidden dimensional warping 72 hours after parts are ejected.

**Any material with over 15% glass or mineral filler content cannot be paired with an unmodified 2-plate cold runner mold without pre-validation of gate shear stress levels**. The required minimum mold type for this material is a modified 2-plate mold with tapered runners and 30% larger gate diameter, or a hot runner mold for cavity counts over 8. For amorphous materials like ABS or PC, the material guide allows a wider process window that can adapt to most standard mold types, but for semi-crystalline reinforced materials, the material guide’s hard constraints must be locked in before any final mold steel selection, not adjusted after the mold is finished.

The second core validation step you can add directly to your supplier audit checklist is to cross-reference every line item in your approved material datasheet against the mold design drawing before first article trial. 90% of mismatch defects can be caught at this stage with two quick checks: confirm the mold’s maximum allowable injection pressure is at least 20% higher than the material guide’s recommended peak injection pressure, and confirm the mold’s cooling line layout covers 95% of the part’s projected surface area within 15mm distance. **Do not approve any first article trial that does not have these two values documented and signed off by the mold maker on the trial run report**.

For your 2026 mass production run, you do not need to scrap the existing mold entirely. The most cost-effective correction is to modify the existing 2-plate mold’s gate size from 1.2mm to 1.8mm, add beryllium copper inserts at the thick handle section, and adjust your material guide’s post-mold conditioning requirement to 48 hours of room temperature resting before dimensional inspection. This will bring your scrap rate down to under 2.5% without requiring a full new mold build, saving you roughly 70% of the cost vs re-tooling. **All future material-mold pairing decisions need to be documented as a controlled cross-reference sheet attached to every part’s quality file, instead of kept as separate unconnected documents in engineering and tooling folders**.

**status:** accepted
**Author:** Sophia Wang
**Date:** 2026-10-24

### Answer 2

The biggest hidden risk from mismatched material guides and mold types appears during post-production assembly, where even minor 0.05mm warpage from uneven cooling can create a 0.2mm total tolerance stack up across 3 connected parts, leading to 100% failure during the snap fit assembly process. For glass-filled nylon handle inserts specifically, if the mold type does not control filler orientation along the part’s long axis, the parts will shrink unevenly across the mounting hole axis, making it impossible to maintain the required 0.02mm clearance for the steel pin that locks the handle to the power tool body.

Add a 72 hour post-ejection dimensional check to your incoming inspection routine, measuring both the hole pitch and the overall part flatness at 6 points per sample batch, to catch latent warpage that does not show up immediately after demolding. This will eliminate unexpected assembly line stoppages that happen weeks after parts are received, even if initial incoming checks pass.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Michael Wu
**Date:** 2026-10-24

### Answer 3

The most common mistake when aligning material guides to mold types is that generic material guides for reinforced resins list a minimum 1 degree draft angle, but do not account for the increased friction from glass fibers sliding along the mold core during ejection. If the mold type uses a standard polished core finish for unreinforced plastic, the glass fibers will scratch the part side wall during ejection, leaving hidden micro cracks that reduce part impact resistance by over 40% even if the dimensional readings are within tolerance.

Before any mold modification is completed, cross reference every wall section thickness on your 3D file against the material guide’s maximum recommended wall thickness for reinforced nylon, and confirm the mold has a minimum 1.5 degree draft angle on all vertical core surfaces, with a fine grain mold texturing that matches the material’s ejection friction requirement. This simple check eliminates most hidden structural defects that do not show up during basic dimensional inspection.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Daniel Yang
**Date:** 2026-10-24

### Answer 4

If modifying your existing mold is not feasible, you can adjust your material selection to create a more forgiving pairing without sacrificing part performance, instead of forcing the current mold to run a resin that it is not designed for. For power tool handle inserts, switching from 20% regular glass filled nylon to 15% long glass fiber reinforced nylon with a 5% impact modifier will widen the material’s processing window enough to run on a standard 2-plate cold runner mold, while still meeting the 1.2m drop test requirement for end use.

The small increase in resin cost per part will be offset by the elimination of mold modification costs and reduced scrap rate, delivering a better total cost of ownership for the full 120,000 unit production run. You can request 2 different material trial batches from your resin supplier to run on the existing mold, and compare impact test results to confirm the performance meets your specs before making any permanent change.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Jason Zhou
**Date:** 2026-10-24

### Answer 5

Mismatched material and mold pairings often lead to field failure risks that cannot be detected during standard lab testing, even if all incoming inspection parameters pass. For example, if the mold type causes uneven filler orientation across the handle insert, 10% of the parts that pass initial impact testing will crack under 500 cycles of repeated high torque load during real world end use, leading to warranty claims 6 to 12 months after the product ships.

Add a 1000 cycle torque load fatigue test to your qualification process for the corrected part, using samples taken directly from the first 100 parts out of the modified mold, to make sure the consistent material properties delivered by the adjusted mold meet all end use performance requirements. Do not rely solely on datasheet values from your resin supplier, as the actual material properties in the finished part are heavily determined by how the mold design controls flow and filler orientation during injection.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Emily Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-24

### Answer 6

Even with a correctly designed mold, running a material outside its documented process window will create the same defects as a bad material-mold pairing. The material guide for reinforced nylon lists a 280 C to 300 C melt temperature window, but if the cold runner mold you are using has a long flow path, the material will cool down 20 C before it reaches the last cavity, creating incomplete fill and blister defects if you do not adjust barrel temperatures accordingly.

Map out the full process window for the paired material and mold type during trial runs, testing 5 different melt temperature, injection speed, and holding pressure combinations, to define the stable operating range that delivers zero defects even with minor raw material lot variation. Document every stable process parameter in your part’s production specification, so that no new operator can accidentally run the part outside of the proven window during high volume production.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Linda Xu
**Date:** 2026-10-24

### Answer 7

Any adjustment to the material guide or mold type needs to be locked in as a formal change control point before you proceed to mass production, to avoid unplanned delays or cost overruns. Schedule a dedicated 2 hour alignment meeting with your supplier’s tooling, process, and quality teams before starting any mold modification work, to walk through the full updated cross reference of material specs and mold parameters, and assign clear owners for each validation checkpoint.

Lock in a 500 piece trial run after the mold modification is completed, with full dimensional and performance testing completed before you sign off on mass production readiness, and do not allow the supplier to skip this step to make up for earlier delays. Add a 1 week buffer to your overall project timeline specifically for this material-mold pairing validation, so that unforeseen small adjustments do not push back your product launch window.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Olivia Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-24

### Answer 8

After you start mass production, you can set up a real time material-mold pairing tracking log that records scrap root cause for every production lot, to identify recurring patterns that indicate slow mold wear or raw material property drift over time. For reinforced nylon parts, mold gate wear will increase by roughly 0.05mm every 10,000 cycles, which will gradually increase shear stress on the incoming material and lead to rising blister defects after 50,000 cycles.

Set up a scheduled preventive maintenance interval for the mold at 40,000 cycles, where the gate diameter is measured and polished back to the original approved size, and cross check the current resin melt flow index against the material guide baseline for every incoming raw material lot to catch drift early. This will keep your production yield stable above 97% for the full lifespan of the mold, avoiding unexpected sudden scrap spikes mid-run.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** David Zhang
**Date:** 2026-10-24

### Answer 9

If you do end up needing to build a new mold later for higher volume runs, the mold core and cavity steel selection needs to be aligned directly to the abrasive properties of the filled material listed on your material guide. 20% glass filled nylon is roughly 3 times more abrasive than unfilled nylon, so using standard P20 mold steel will lead to 0.1mm of core wear after 100,000 cycles, which will throw off part dimensional tolerance and increase scrap rate.

Select hardened H13 steel for all core and cavity surfaces, and add a 0.02mm chrome plating layer on the flow path surfaces, to extend the mold lifespan by 3 times with almost no additional cost. When machining the mold cavity, use a 3 step finishing process with a 0.8mm ball end mill, followed by a fine grinding pass, to achieve the exact surface finish that matches the material’s ejection requirement, without creating extra friction that leads to part sticking and scratch defects.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Eric Zhao
**Date:** 2026-10-24

## Related Resources

- [Injection Molding Q&A](https://www.jaterson.com/qa/injection-molding/)
- [Plastic Injection Molding](https://www.jaterson.com/capabilities/plastic-injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Guide](https://www.jaterson.com/manufacturing/injection-molding/)
- [Injection Molding Buying Guides](https://www.jaterson.com/buying/injection-molding/)
- [Products](https://www.jaterson.com/products/)
- [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.jaterson.com/custom-manufacturing/)
- [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.jaterson.com/knowledge/)
- [Injection Molding](https://www.jaterson.com/knowledge/injection-molding/)

## Structured Data

```json
[
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "QAPage",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "How to match injection molding material properties to the correct mold type?",
        "text": "I am responsible for incoming inspection and supplier audits for our power tool accessory line, and we just ran 3 pilot batches of 20% glass-filled nylon handle inserts last month that ended up with 18% scrap rate from inconsistent dimensional tolerance, random surface blistering, and unconfirmed long-term impact resistance. Our current supplier says the issue is that the standard material guide we shared for general nylon parts does not align with the 2-plate cold runner mold they used, but our internal engineering team argues the mold should have been adjusted to fit the material specs we submitted. We are now stuck with 1200 rejected parts, a 2-week delay to our product launch window, and no clear decision framework to approve new mold revisions or adjust our material specs for the 2026 mass production run of 120,000 units. I need a clear material guide vs mold type comparison that tells me exactly what checkpoints I should add to our supplier audit checklist and incoming quality standards to prevent this exact mismatch from happening again.",
        "answerCount": 9,
        "upvoteCount": 12,
        "datePublished": "2026-10-24T07:37:49Z",
        "dateModified": "2026-10-24T07:59:12Z",
        "author": {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Anonymous",
          "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html"
        }
                ,"acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The root cause of your 18% scrap rate traces back to the unvalidated pairing between glass-filled nylon’s high shear sensitivity and the standard 2-plate cold runner mold that was not optimized for reinforced resins, a very common mismatch that 32% of 2026 injection molding pilot projects report during first run validation, per internal production data. Most generic material guides only list tensile strength and melt flow index, but they omit critical process requirements that directly determine which mold type will deliver consistent output. The core comparison between the two frameworks is straightforward: the material guide defines non-negotiable parameters including melt temperature window, shear rate limit, filler orientation control requirement, and cooling time tolerance, while the mold type defines inherent design constraints including runner system layout, gate location, number of cavities, and pressure holding capacity. For 20% glass-filled nylon specifically, the generic material guide for unreinforced nylon that you referenced sets a 40s total cycle time, but a standard 2-plate cold runner mold can only deliver maximum 32s cooling time for thick wall sections, which creates uneven crystallinity that leads to hidden dimensional warping 72 hours after parts are ejected. Any material with over 15% glass or mineral filler content cannot be paired with an unmodified 2-plate cold runner mold without pre-validation of gate shear stress levels . The required minimum mold type for this material is a modified 2-plate mold with tapered runners and 30% larger gate diameter, or a hot runner mold for cavity counts over 8. For amorphous materials like ABS or PC, the material guide allows a wider process window that can adapt to most standard mold types, but for semi-crystalline reinforced materials, the material guide’s hard constraints must be locked in before any final mold steel selection, not adjusted after the mold is finished. The second core validation step you can add directly to your supplier audit checklist is to cross-reference every line item in your approved material datasheet against the mold design drawing before first article trial. 90% of mismatch defects can be caught at this stage with two quick checks: confirm the mold’s maximum allowable injection pressure is at least 20% higher than the material guide’s recommended peak injection pressure, and confirm the mold’s cooling line layout covers 95% of the part’s projected surface area within 15mm distance. Do not approve any first article trial that does not have these two values documented and signed off by the mold maker on the trial run report . For your 2026 mass production run, you do not need to scrap the existing mold entirely. The most cost-effective correction is to modify the existing 2-plate mold’s gate size from 1.2mm to 1.8mm, add beryllium copper inserts at the thick handle section, and adjust your material guide’s post-mold conditioning requirement to 48 hours of room temperature resting before dimensional inspection. This will bring your scrap rate down to under 2.5% without requiring a full new mold build, saving you roughly 70% of the cost vs re-tooling. All future material-mold pairing decisions need to be documented as a controlled cross-reference sheet attached to every part’s quality file, instead of kept as separate unconnected documents in engineering and tooling folders .",
            "upvoteCount": 12,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html#acceptedAnswer",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-24T09:45:08Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Sophia Wang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/sophia.html"}        }
                ,"suggestedAnswer": [
                  {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The biggest hidden risk from mismatched material guides and mold types appears during post-production assembly, where even minor 0.05mm warpage from uneven cooling can create a 0.2mm total tolerance stack up across 3 connected parts, leading to 100% failure during the snap fit assembly process. For glass-filled nylon handle inserts specifically, if the mold type does not control filler orientation along the part’s long axis, the parts will shrink unevenly across the mounting hole axis, making it impossible to maintain the required 0.02mm clearance for the steel pin that locks the handle to the power tool body. Add a 72 hour post-ejection dimensional check to your incoming inspection routine, measuring both the hole pitch and the overall part flatness at 6 points per sample batch, to catch latent warpage that does not show up immediately after demolding. This will eliminate unexpected assembly line stoppages that happen weeks after parts are received, even if initial incoming checks pass.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html#suggestedAnswer-2",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-24T09:43:18Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/michael.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The most common mistake when aligning material guides to mold types is that generic material guides for reinforced resins list a minimum 1 degree draft angle, but do not account for the increased friction from glass fibers sliding along the mold core during ejection. If the mold type uses a standard polished core finish for unreinforced plastic, the glass fibers will scratch the part side wall during ejection, leaving hidden micro cracks that reduce part impact resistance by over 40% even if the dimensional readings are within tolerance. Before any mold modification is completed, cross reference every wall section thickness on your 3D file against the material guide’s maximum recommended wall thickness for reinforced nylon, and confirm the mold has a minimum 1.5 degree draft angle on all vertical core surfaces, with a fine grain mold texturing that matches the material’s ejection friction requirement. This simple check eliminates most hidden structural defects that do not show up during basic dimensional inspection.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html#suggestedAnswer-3",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-24T09:28:58Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/daniel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "If modifying your existing mold is not feasible, you can adjust your material selection to create a more forgiving pairing without sacrificing part performance, instead of forcing the current mold to run a resin that it is not designed for. For power tool handle inserts, switching from 20% regular glass filled nylon to 15% long glass fiber reinforced nylon with a 5% impact modifier will widen the material’s processing window enough to run on a standard 2-plate cold runner mold, while still meeting the 1.2m drop test requirement for end use. The small increase in resin cost per part will be offset by the elimination of mold modification costs and reduced scrap rate, delivering a better total cost of ownership for the full 120,000 unit production run. You can request 2 different material trial batches from your resin supplier to run on the existing mold, and compare impact test results to confirm the performance meets your specs before making any permanent change.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html#suggestedAnswer-4",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-24T09:27:50Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Jason Zhou","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/jason.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Mismatched material and mold pairings often lead to field failure risks that cannot be detected during standard lab testing, even if all incoming inspection parameters pass. For example, if the mold type causes uneven filler orientation across the handle insert, 10% of the parts that pass initial impact testing will crack under 500 cycles of repeated high torque load during real world end use, leading to warranty claims 6 to 12 months after the product ships. Add a 1000 cycle torque load fatigue test to your qualification process for the corrected part, using samples taken directly from the first 100 parts out of the modified mold, to make sure the consistent material properties delivered by the adjusted mold meet all end use performance requirements. Do not rely solely on datasheet values from your resin supplier, as the actual material properties in the finished part are heavily determined by how the mold design controls flow and filler orientation during injection.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html#suggestedAnswer-5",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-24T09:19:07Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Emily Chen","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/emily.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Even with a correctly designed mold, running a material outside its documented process window will create the same defects as a bad material-mold pairing. The material guide for reinforced nylon lists a 280 C to 300 C melt temperature window, but if the cold runner mold you are using has a long flow path, the material will cool down 20 C before it reaches the last cavity, creating incomplete fill and blister defects if you do not adjust barrel temperatures accordingly. Map out the full process window for the paired material and mold type during trial runs, testing 5 different melt temperature, injection speed, and holding pressure combinations, to define the stable operating range that delivers zero defects even with minor raw material lot variation. Document every stable process parameter in your part’s production specification, so that no new operator can accidentally run the part outside of the proven window during high volume production.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html#suggestedAnswer-6",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-24T09:15:59Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Linda Xu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/linda.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Any adjustment to the material guide or mold type needs to be locked in as a formal change control point before you proceed to mass production, to avoid unplanned delays or cost overruns. Schedule a dedicated 2 hour alignment meeting with your supplier’s tooling, process, and quality teams before starting any mold modification work, to walk through the full updated cross reference of material specs and mold parameters, and assign clear owners for each validation checkpoint. Lock in a 500 piece trial run after the mold modification is completed, with full dimensional and performance testing completed before you sign off on mass production readiness, and do not allow the supplier to skip this step to make up for earlier delays. Add a 1 week buffer to your overall project timeline specifically for this material-mold pairing validation, so that unforeseen small adjustments do not push back your product launch window.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html#suggestedAnswer-7",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-24T08:49:40Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Olivia Chen","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/olivia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "After you start mass production, you can set up a real time material-mold pairing tracking log that records scrap root cause for every production lot, to identify recurring patterns that indicate slow mold wear or raw material property drift over time. For reinforced nylon parts, mold gate wear will increase by roughly 0.05mm every 10,000 cycles, which will gradually increase shear stress on the incoming material and lead to rising blister defects after 50,000 cycles. Set up a scheduled preventive maintenance interval for the mold at 40,000 cycles, where the gate diameter is measured and polished back to the original approved size, and cross check the current resin melt flow index against the material guide baseline for every incoming raw material lot to catch drift early. This will keep your production yield stable above 97% for the full lifespan of the mold, avoiding unexpected sudden scrap spikes mid-run.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html#suggestedAnswer-8",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-24T08:34:49Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "David Zhang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/david.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "If you do end up needing to build a new mold later for higher volume runs, the mold core and cavity steel selection needs to be aligned directly to the abrasive properties of the filled material listed on your material guide. 20% glass filled nylon is roughly 3 times more abrasive than unfilled nylon, so using standard P20 mold steel will lead to 0.1mm of core wear after 100,000 cycles, which will throw off part dimensional tolerance and increase scrap rate. Select hardened H13 steel for all core and cavity surfaces, and add a 0.02mm chrome plating layer on the flow path surfaces, to extend the mold lifespan by 3 times with almost no additional cost. When machining the mold cavity, use a 3 step finishing process with a 0.8mm ball end mill, followed by a fine grinding pass, to achieve the exact surface finish that matches the material’s ejection requirement, without creating extra friction that leads to part sticking and scratch defects.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/match-injection-molding-material-properties-correct-mold-type.html#suggestedAnswer-9",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-24T07:59:12Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Eric Zhao","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/eric.html"}          }
                  ]
              }
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
          {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Injection Molding Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/injection-molding/"}          ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "How to match injection molding material properties to the correct mold type?"}
      ]
    }
]
```