---
title: "What are the critical quality control points for ODM power tool plastic housing shells?"
description: "Mid-sized hardware brands often face assembly misalignment, vibration cracking, and launch delay risks when sourcing ODM power tool housing shells. This guide outlines clear audit criteria, pre-production validation rules and process control steps to cut mass production defect rates and meet tight launch timelines."
url: "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html"
language: "en"
type: "Q&A"
category: "Custom Manufacturing Q&A"
datePublished: "2026-10-14"
dateModified: "2026-10-14"
brand: "OK TOOL"
manufacturer: "OK TOOL"
answerCount: 9
---

# What are the critical quality control points for ODM power tool plastic housing shells?

## Question

 Last quarter we launched a new 20V cordless impact driver line, and our first batch of ODM-sourced power tool housing shells had a 12% failure rate during field testing: 7% showed unqualified screw boss misalignment that stopped assembly lines, another 5% cracked after 50 hours of continuous high-load vibration testing. Our current supplier can only adjust parameters randomly and push out the fix timeline for 6 weeks, which will make us miss the peak Q3 retail launch window. I am now evaluating new ODM partners for the second production run of 120,000 units. I need to figure out what core assessment criteria I should prioritize first during supplier audit, how to confirm they can lock in stable housing quality before mass production, and what clear performance clauses should be added into the contract to avoid repeating the same defect issues and launch delay risks. We do not want to spend extra 15% of the budget for full custom tooling if minor adjustments to existing validated ODM housing designs can meet our performance requirements. 

## Answers
                            
### Answer 1 — Best Answer

The core difference between a qualified power tool housing ODM project and a generic consumer plastic injection project lies in three non-negotiable performance requirements that most general injection shops cannot deliver consistently: 1. Screw boss concentricity tolerance held within ±0.08mm across 100k+ shots, 2. Notched impact strength retained above 15kJ/m² after 72 hours of 85°C thermal aging, 3. Housing split line flash thickness controlled below 0.03mm to avoid user cut hazards. Most unqualified suppliers you will encounter only check dimensional tolerance at room temperature, and do not validate performance under actual power tool operating conditions, which is the root cause of your 12% field failure rate in the last run.

First, sort out two applicable scenarios before supplier audit. If you select to modify an existing validated ODM housing design instead of making full custom tooling, you can cut your tooling lead time from 6 weeks to 10 days, and reduce initial cost by 40%, but you need to confirm the existing design’s wall thickness distribution matches your impact driver’s internal component layout, no forced assembly that creates residual stress. If you choose full custom tooling, you can get 100% design freedom for your specific product, but you need to reserve 2 extra weeks for DFM review and prototype validation.

When conducting supplier audit, prioritize checking three hard evidence on site instead of reviewing paper documents. **Ask to pull 3 consecutive batches of production records of their previously delivered power tool housing parts, cross check their process parameter log for melt temperature, holding pressure and cooling time, confirm they do not arbitrarily cut cooling time to boost cycle speed which causes residual stress and post-mold warpage.** Then check their lab test bench, confirm they have the actual vibration test fixture matching standard power tool load cycles, not only a general impact tester. **Lock in clear acceptance criteria for pre-production samples, that 20 consecutive sample parts must pass 100 hours of full load vibration test with zero crack, and all 6 screw boss concentricity data fall within ±0.08mm, before they are allowed to start mass production.** For contract clauses, add a 10% performance holdback that will only be released 30 days after the full batch passes your incoming quality inspection, and define a clear delay penalty of 0.5% of total order value per day if the defect rate exceeds 2% during mass production. **Arrange a 2-day on-site process audit after the first 2 hours of mold trial, before they make any adjustment to process parameters that will compromise part performance for higher output.**

For your 120,000 unit run, the most cost-effective path is to select a pre-validated ODM housing base, make 2 small modifications on the local mounting bosses to fit your unique internal motor layout, this path can make your total lead time from design lock to first shipment stay within 28 days, which fully covers your Q3 launch window, and the projected mass production defect rate can be controlled below 1.2% if all the pre-production check points are executed properly.

**status:** accepted
**Author:** Linda Xu
**Date:** 2026-10-14

### Answer 2

When you validate sample performance, you should not only run standard vibration testing on bare housing parts, you need to assemble the housing with your actual internal motor, gearbox and battery pack as a full unit for testing. Many housing parts that pass independent lab testing will crack under real operation, because the dynamic vibration resonance frequency of the full assembled unit is different from the bare part, which creates extra stress concentration on the thin wall sections near the trigger opening.

You also need to confirm the surface texture of the housing can resist common industrial cleaning chemicals that end users often apply on power tools, such as degreasers and rust removers, to avoid surface cracking or fading after 6 months of regular use. You can also add a check for the housing’s ergonomic grip section deformation, after 1000 cycles of 50N squeeze force applied on the grip area, the deformation should not exceed 0.2mm to avoid uncomfortable user handling.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Daniel Yang
**Date:** 2026-10-14

### Answer 3

The biggest hidden risk for ODM power tool housing projects is unaddressed tolerance stack up that causes assembly jams during high speed mass production. You need to collect all dimensional data of your internal components including motor mounting plate, trigger switch, battery interface, and map the full tolerance chain before the ODM supplier finalizes the housing dimension.

For example, if your motor plate has a tolerance of ±0.1mm and the housing mounting boss has a tolerance of ±0.1mm, the total accumulated tolerance can reach 0.2mm, which will create misalignment that stops automatic screw driving stations on your assembly line. It is recommended to hold the housing mounting hole tolerance 30% tighter than your internal component tolerance, to reserve a buffer for the full tolerance chain. You also need to confirm the housing split line has no sharp edge burrs that will scratch the internal wiring during manual assembly, which will cause hidden short circuit risks for the final power tool.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Emily Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-14

### Answer 4

You need to build 3 tiered inspection check points that are aligned with power tool housing specific requirements, instead of applying general plastic part inspection standards. For incoming quality inspection of each batch, you take 200 samples per 10,000 units, first check all critical dimensions for 20 samples, then run 100 hours vibration test for 5 randomly selected units, to catch any hidden quality drift before the full batch is shipped.

For in-process inspection during production, the supplier needs to record 5 parts’ key dimensional data every 2 hours, to trace any gradual mold wear that may cause dimensional deviation after 5000+ shots. For final outgoing inspection, 100% visual check for surface crack, flash and discoloration, and reject all parts with flash over 0.03mm on the grip section. You also need to require the supplier to keep all inspection records for at least 2 years, for traceability if any field failure happens later.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Amy Li
**Date:** 2026-10-14

### Answer 5

The root cause of most screw boss misalignment issues is uneven holding pressure distribution during injection molding, which creates uneven internal stress that pulls the boss off center after parts cool down. The correct process adjustment is to split the holding pressure into 3 stages, instead of applying single stage high holding pressure for the full packing period.

First apply 80 bar holding pressure for 3 seconds to fill the main body of the housing, then reduce to 45 bar for 7 seconds to pack the screw boss section slowly, then drop to 20 bar for 5 seconds to avoid over packing the gate area. This adjustment can reduce boss misalignment by over 70% without increasing cycle time. For warpage issues, the supplier should set the mold temperature difference between core side and cavity side within 5°C, instead of running 15°C difference to speed up cooling, which creates uneven shrinkage that leads to long term part deformation.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Sophia Wang
**Date:** 2026-10-14

### Answer 6

For 120,000 unit volume production, the housing production line layout should be optimized to avoid extra part handling that causes surface scratch and deformation. All parts should be automatically ejected from the mold and dropped into custom designed soft foam trays, not piled up in large plastic sacks, which causes scratches and hidden impact damage on thin wall sections.

The total cycle time for each housing part should be controlled within 55 seconds, do not push the cycle time below 45 seconds, which will force the process team to cut cooling time too short, leading to parts being ejected when they are not fully cured, creating post mold warpage that shows up 72 hours after production. You can require the supplier to keep all produced parts in a constant temperature workshop for 24 hours after demolding, before they do final dimensional inspection and packaging, to let all natural post mold shrinkage complete first, so the dimensional data you collect is stable and accurate.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Michael Wu
**Date:** 2026-10-14

### Answer 7

The gate location selection for power tool housing has huge impact on final part performance, many generic injection molds place the gate on the outer cosmetic surface to reduce material waste, but that creates a visible weld line right in the middle of the grip section, which is the highest stress area during power tool operation, leading to easy cracking under high vibration.

The correct gate design for half of the housing shell should be placed on the inner non-cosmetic side near the motor opening, so the material flow direction will align with the highest stress load path, which improves the overall impact strength by over 25%. You also need to add at least 4 overflow wells at the end of the material flow path, to collect the cold material that creates weak weld lines on the thin wall edges, this small adjustment can eliminate over 60% of edge crack issues that happen during field use.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Kevin Liu
**Date:** 2026-10-14

### Answer 8

For power tool housing molds that run over 100,000 shots, the core and cavity steel should select P20 modified steel with 40-42 HRC hardness, not the lower hardness 2311 steel that many general shops use for low cost consumer products. The higher hardness steel can keep the screw boss dimensional stability for over 150,000 shots, while lower hardness steel will show local wear on the boss inserts after 60,000 shots, which leads to gradual concentricity drift.

The mold should also have replaceable inserts for the screw boss sections, instead of machining the boss directly on the full core block, this way when local wear happens, the maintenance can be finished within 2 hours, no need to take the full mold out of production for multiple days. The required regular mold maintenance cycle is every 25,000 shots, to clean the vent slots and check for any local burr on the mold edge, to prevent flash issues that come from worn vent slots.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Rachel Huang
**Date:** 2026-10-14

### Answer 9

The most common avoidable design flaw for power tool ODM housing shells is uneven wall thickness, which creates huge difference in shrinkage rate that leads to internal residual stress and later cracking. Any wall thickness difference on the housing should not exceed 20%, for example, if the main body wall thickness is 2.5mm, the local thick section near the screw boss should not exceed 3mm, and you need to add a 0.8mm thick rib on the back side of the boss to distribute stress, instead of making the boss a full thick solid section.

All inside corners of the housing should have a minimum 0.5mm radius, not sharp 90 degree corners, which act as stress concentration points that crack first under continuous vibration. You also need to confirm the draft angle for both core and cavity sides is at least 1.5 degree, to avoid excessive ejection force that creates hidden scratch and residual stress on the inner surface of the housing during demolding.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** David Zhang
**Date:** 2026-10-14

## Related Resources

- [Custom Manufacturing Q&A](https://www.jaterson.com/qa/oem-odm/)
- [Products](https://www.jaterson.com/products/)
- [Capabilities](https://www.jaterson.com/capabilities/)
- [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.jaterson.com/custom-manufacturing/)
- [Manufacturing Guides](https://www.jaterson.com/manufacturing/)
- [Buying Guides](https://www.jaterson.com/buying/)
- [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.jaterson.com/knowledge/)

## Structured Data

```json
[
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "QAPage",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "What are the critical quality control points for ODM power tool plastic housing shells?",
        "text": "Last quarter we launched a new 20V cordless impact driver line, and our first batch of ODM-sourced power tool housing shells had a 12% failure rate during field testing: 7% showed unqualified screw boss misalignment that stopped assembly lines, another 5% cracked after 50 hours of continuous high-load vibration testing. Our current supplier can only adjust parameters randomly and push out the fix timeline for 6 weeks, which will make us miss the peak Q3 retail launch window. I am now evaluating new ODM partners for the second production run of 120,000 units. I need to figure out what core assessment criteria I should prioritize first during supplier audit, how to confirm they can lock in stable housing quality before mass production, and what clear performance clauses should be added into the contract to avoid repeating the same defect issues and launch delay risks. We do not want to spend extra 15% of the budget for full custom tooling if minor adjustments to existing validated ODM housing designs can meet our performance requirements.",
        "answerCount": 9,
        "upvoteCount": 6,
        "datePublished": "2026-10-14T02:38:18Z",
        "dateModified": "2026-10-14T02:40:38Z",
        "author": {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Anonymous",
          "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html"
        }
                ,"acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The core difference between a qualified power tool housing ODM project and a generic consumer plastic injection project lies in three non-negotiable performance requirements that most general injection shops cannot deliver consistently: 1. Screw boss concentricity tolerance held within ±0.08mm across 100k+ shots, 2. Notched impact strength retained above 15kJ/m² after 72 hours of 85°C thermal aging, 3. Housing split line flash thickness controlled below 0.03mm to avoid user cut hazards. Most unqualified suppliers you will encounter only check dimensional tolerance at room temperature, and do not validate performance under actual power tool operating conditions, which is the root cause of your 12% field failure rate in the last run. First, sort out two applicable scenarios before supplier audit. If you select to modify an existing validated ODM housing design instead of making full custom tooling, you can cut your tooling lead time from 6 weeks to 10 days, and reduce initial cost by 40%, but you need to confirm the existing design’s wall thickness distribution matches your impact driver’s internal component layout, no forced assembly that creates residual stress. If you choose full custom tooling, you can get 100% design freedom for your specific product, but you need to reserve 2 extra weeks for DFM review and prototype validation. When conducting supplier audit, prioritize checking three hard evidence on site instead of reviewing paper documents. Ask to pull 3 consecutive batches of production records of their previously delivered power tool housing parts, cross check their process parameter log for melt temperature, holding pressure and cooling time, confirm they do not arbitrarily cut cooling time to boost cycle speed which causes residual stress and post-mold warpage. Then check their lab test bench, confirm they have the actual vibration test fixture matching standard power tool load cycles, not only a general impact tester. Lock in clear acceptance criteria for pre-production samples, that 20 consecutive sample parts must pass 100 hours of full load vibration test with zero crack, and all 6 screw boss concentricity data fall within ±0.08mm, before they are allowed to start mass production. For contract clauses, add a 10% performance holdback that will only be released 30 days after the full batch passes your incoming quality inspection, and define a clear delay penalty of 0.5% of total order value per day if the defect rate exceeds 2% during mass production. Arrange a 2-day on-site process audit after the first 2 hours of mold trial, before they make any adjustment to process parameters that will compromise part performance for higher output. For your 120,000 unit run, the most cost-effective path is to select a pre-validated ODM housing base, make 2 small modifications on the local mounting bosses to fit your unique internal motor layout, this path can make your total lead time from design lock to first shipment stay within 28 days, which fully covers your Q3 launch window, and the projected mass production defect rate can be controlled below 1.2% if all the pre-production check points are executed properly.",
            "upvoteCount": 6,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html#acceptedAnswer",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-14T03:25:19Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Linda Xu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/linda.html"}        }
                ,"suggestedAnswer": [
                  {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "When you validate sample performance, you should not only run standard vibration testing on bare housing parts, you need to assemble the housing with your actual internal motor, gearbox and battery pack as a full unit for testing. Many housing parts that pass independent lab testing will crack under real operation, because the dynamic vibration resonance frequency of the full assembled unit is different from the bare part, which creates extra stress concentration on the thin wall sections near the trigger opening. You also need to confirm the surface texture of the housing can resist common industrial cleaning chemicals that end users often apply on power tools, such as degreasers and rust removers, to avoid surface cracking or fading after 6 months of regular use. You can also add a check for the housing’s ergonomic grip section deformation, after 1000 cycles of 50N squeeze force applied on the grip area, the deformation should not exceed 0.2mm to avoid uncomfortable user handling.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html#suggestedAnswer-2",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-14T03:22:34Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/daniel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The biggest hidden risk for ODM power tool housing projects is unaddressed tolerance stack up that causes assembly jams during high speed mass production. You need to collect all dimensional data of your internal components including motor mounting plate, trigger switch, battery interface, and map the full tolerance chain before the ODM supplier finalizes the housing dimension. For example, if your motor plate has a tolerance of ±0.1mm and the housing mounting boss has a tolerance of ±0.1mm, the total accumulated tolerance can reach 0.2mm, which will create misalignment that stops automatic screw driving stations on your assembly line. It is recommended to hold the housing mounting hole tolerance 30% tighter than your internal component tolerance, to reserve a buffer for the full tolerance chain. You also need to confirm the housing split line has no sharp edge burrs that will scratch the internal wiring during manual assembly, which will cause hidden short circuit risks for the final power tool.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html#suggestedAnswer-3",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-14T03:16:10Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Emily Chen","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/emily.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "You need to build 3 tiered inspection check points that are aligned with power tool housing specific requirements, instead of applying general plastic part inspection standards. For incoming quality inspection of each batch, you take 200 samples per 10,000 units, first check all critical dimensions for 20 samples, then run 100 hours vibration test for 5 randomly selected units, to catch any hidden quality drift before the full batch is shipped. For in-process inspection during production, the supplier needs to record 5 parts’ key dimensional data every 2 hours, to trace any gradual mold wear that may cause dimensional deviation after 5000+ shots. For final outgoing inspection, 100% visual check for surface crack, flash and discoloration, and reject all parts with flash over 0.03mm on the grip section. You also need to require the supplier to keep all inspection records for at least 2 years, for traceability if any field failure happens later.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html#suggestedAnswer-4",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-14T03:08:47Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Amy Li","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/amy.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The root cause of most screw boss misalignment issues is uneven holding pressure distribution during injection molding, which creates uneven internal stress that pulls the boss off center after parts cool down. The correct process adjustment is to split the holding pressure into 3 stages, instead of applying single stage high holding pressure for the full packing period. First apply 80 bar holding pressure for 3 seconds to fill the main body of the housing, then reduce to 45 bar for 7 seconds to pack the screw boss section slowly, then drop to 20 bar for 5 seconds to avoid over packing the gate area. This adjustment can reduce boss misalignment by over 70% without increasing cycle time. For warpage issues, the supplier should set the mold temperature difference between core side and cavity side within 5°C, instead of running 15°C difference to speed up cooling, which creates uneven shrinkage that leads to long term part deformation.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html#suggestedAnswer-5",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-14T02:58:14Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Sophia Wang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/sophia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "For 120,000 unit volume production, the housing production line layout should be optimized to avoid extra part handling that causes surface scratch and deformation. All parts should be automatically ejected from the mold and dropped into custom designed soft foam trays, not piled up in large plastic sacks, which causes scratches and hidden impact damage on thin wall sections. The total cycle time for each housing part should be controlled within 55 seconds, do not push the cycle time below 45 seconds, which will force the process team to cut cooling time too short, leading to parts being ejected when they are not fully cured, creating post mold warpage that shows up 72 hours after production. You can require the supplier to keep all produced parts in a constant temperature workshop for 24 hours after demolding, before they do final dimensional inspection and packaging, to let all natural post mold shrinkage complete first, so the dimensional data you collect is stable and accurate.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html#suggestedAnswer-6",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-14T02:51:37Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/michael.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The gate location selection for power tool housing has huge impact on final part performance, many generic injection molds place the gate on the outer cosmetic surface to reduce material waste, but that creates a visible weld line right in the middle of the grip section, which is the highest stress area during power tool operation, leading to easy cracking under high vibration. The correct gate design for half of the housing shell should be placed on the inner non-cosmetic side near the motor opening, so the material flow direction will align with the highest stress load path, which improves the overall impact strength by over 25%. You also need to add at least 4 overflow wells at the end of the material flow path, to collect the cold material that creates weak weld lines on the thin wall edges, this small adjustment can eliminate over 60% of edge crack issues that happen during field use.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html#suggestedAnswer-7",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-14T02:48:47Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Kevin Liu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/kevin.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "For power tool housing molds that run over 100,000 shots, the core and cavity steel should select P20 modified steel with 40-42 HRC hardness, not the lower hardness 2311 steel that many general shops use for low cost consumer products. The higher hardness steel can keep the screw boss dimensional stability for over 150,000 shots, while lower hardness steel will show local wear on the boss inserts after 60,000 shots, which leads to gradual concentricity drift. The mold should also have replaceable inserts for the screw boss sections, instead of machining the boss directly on the full core block, this way when local wear happens, the maintenance can be finished within 2 hours, no need to take the full mold out of production for multiple days. The required regular mold maintenance cycle is every 25,000 shots, to clean the vent slots and check for any local burr on the mold edge, to prevent flash issues that come from worn vent slots.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html#suggestedAnswer-8",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-14T02:43:40Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Rachel Huang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/rachel.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The most common avoidable design flaw for power tool ODM housing shells is uneven wall thickness, which creates huge difference in shrinkage rate that leads to internal residual stress and later cracking. Any wall thickness difference on the housing should not exceed 20%, for example, if the main body wall thickness is 2.5mm, the local thick section near the screw boss should not exceed 3mm, and you need to add a 0.8mm thick rib on the back side of the boss to distribute stress, instead of making the boss a full thick solid section. All inside corners of the housing should have a minimum 0.5mm radius, not sharp 90 degree corners, which act as stress concentration points that crack first under continuous vibration. You also need to confirm the draft angle for both core and cavity sides is at least 1.5 degree, to avoid excessive ejection force that creates hidden scratch and residual stress on the inner surface of the housing during demolding.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/critical-quality-control-points-odm-power-tool-plastic-housing-shells.html#suggestedAnswer-9",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-14T02:40:38Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "David Zhang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/david.html"}          }
                  ]
              }
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
          {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Custom Manufacturing Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/oem-odm/"}          ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "What are the critical quality control points for ODM power tool plastic housing shells?"}
      ]
    }
]
```