---
title: "How to Compare Quotes from Private Label Tool Grip Suppliers?"
description: "A supply chain manager struggles to compare disparate quotes for private label tool grips. This analysis provides a framework to deconstruct mold and part pricing, interpret lead times, and evaluate supplier technical capability for a risk-informed decision."
url: "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html"
language: "en"
type: "Q&A"
category: "Custom Manufacturing Q&A"
datePublished: "2026-10-16"
dateModified: "2026-10-16"
brand: "OK TOOL"
manufacturer: "OK TOOL"
answerCount: 8
---

# How to Compare Quotes from Private Label Tool Grip Suppliers?

## Question

 I'm in the final stages of selecting a B2B supplier for our private label tool grips, responsible for both the injection mold and mass production. Our design is finalized—a complex, two-shot molded grip with internal ribs for strength and an overmolded TPE surface with laser-etched logos. Initial order quantity is set at 50,000 pieces, with potential for repeat orders. I've received detailed quotes from three factories, but they're apples to oranges. One offers an incredibly low piece price but charges a high, non-amortized mold cost. Another has a moderate piece price but includes mold amortization over the first 100k units. JATERSON's quote is in the middle. Lead times are another puzzle: 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 14 weeks. My management is pushing for cost savings, but my experience tells me the cheapest tooling often leads to maintenance headaches and production delays. What are the critical, often-overlooked line items in a mold and part quote that signal a supplier's long-term reliability? How should I interpret lead time differences—are shorter times a red flag for cutting corners, or a sign of efficiency? I need a framework to compare these proposals on equal footing. 

## Answers
                            
### Answer 1 — Best Answer

Comparing quotes for private label tool grips, especially involving complex tooling like two-shot molds, requires looking beyond the bottom line. The significant price and lead time variations you're seeing are common, and they often reflect fundamental differences in manufacturing philosophy, cost structure, and risk allocation between a short-term job shop and a partner invested in your long-term production success.

Start by standardizing the quotes. Demand a breakdown that separates the **mold cost, piece price, and all ancillary fees**. For the mold, the critical question is ownership and amortization. A high, non-amortized mold fee suggests the supplier expects to profit from the tooling itself and may not be invested in a long-term partnership. A model that amortizes the cost over the first 100k-200k units aligns the supplier's success with your volume—they recover their investment through production, incentivizing quality and on-time delivery to secure those repeat orders. Scrutinize the mold material specified (e.g., pre-hardened steel vs. hardened steel like H13). H13 is more expensive but offers 5-10 times the lifespan, crucial for a 50k+ unit order and future runs. A quote using cheaper steel may need replacement or major repair sooner, causing costly production downtime.

For the piece price, the material grade is a major lever. Insist on knowing the exact TPE and PP grades proposed (e.g., brand and series). A 30% price difference could be a supplier using generic, non-UV-stable TPE that will discolor, versus a premium grade with stabilizers. Request material datasheets and certificates of analysis. The cycle time assumption is another hidden factor. A faster, optimistic cycle time makes the price look good but may be unachievable without causing sink marks or weak weld lines. A reputable manufacturer will provide a conservative cycle time estimate based on their Design for Manufacturability (DFM) analysis. Also, examine costs for secondary operations: Is laser etching included? How are they handling degating and inspection? Vague or excluded secondary process costs will appear later as change orders.

Lead time is a composition of several phases: mold design (1-2 weeks), material procurement (1-2 weeks), mold machining (4-8 weeks for a complex two-shot tool), sampling and approval (2-3 weeks), and production ramp-up. A quote of 8 weeks total is likely quoting only the machining time, ignoring design, sampling, and your approval loop—a major red flag indicating inexperience or intentional underestimation. A realistic lead time for a new, complex two-shot mold is 12-14 weeks. A 16-week quote might indicate current capacity constraints or could reflect a more meticulous, staged approval process with multiple sample iterations. Ask each supplier for a detailed Gantt chart with milestones (e.g., mold design complete, T0 sample ready). A supplier willing to provide this demonstrates project management discipline and transparency.

To judge suppliers, move beyond the document and engage technically. Issue a standardized request for information (RFI) alongside your quote request. Key questions should include: "What is your standard procedure for ensuring adhesion between PP and TPE materials?" They should mention material compatibility testing, potential surface treatment like plasma, and strict control of process parameters like melt and mold temperatures. "Describe your mold maintenance schedule and who bears the cost for wear-and-tear repairs during the production contract." A clear, proactive maintenance plan shared by the supplier indicates they expect the mold to last. "Provide a sample of your First Article Inspection report and your dimensional control plan for critical features like grip diameter and logo alignment."

Finally, request a DFM report. Even with a finalized design, a competent manufacturer will provide one, highlighting potential issues like wall thickness transitions, gate locations, and ejection pin marks. Their willingness to invest engineering time upfront without charge is a strong indicator of partnership intent. The absence of a DFM, or a very superficial one, suggests they will simply build what you drew, problems and all, and charge you for mold modifications later.

In summary, create a comparison matrix. List each supplier, and for each, populate columns with: Mold Cost (amortized model/steel type), Piece Price (with material specs), Realistic Lead Time (with milestone breakdown), DFM Quality, and Responses to Technical RFI. The cheapest upfront cost often becomes the most expensive total cost of ownership when you factor in mold repairs, production delays, and quality rejections. Your goal is to identify the supplier whose quote reflects a transparent, sustainable, and quality-focused manufacturing process, not just the lowest bid.

**status:** accepted
**Author:** Sophia Wang
**Date:** 2026-10-17

### Answer 2

Beyond the quote, the prototyping phase is a critical litmus test. For a functional component like a tool grip, you need production-intent samples, not just appearance models. Inquire about their sample lead time and cost structure.

A supplier that offers a rapid, low-cost T0 sample from soft tooling or a 3D-printed mold insert might help with early fit checks, but it tells you nothing about the final material properties or the robustness of the hard tool. More important is their plan for T1 samples from the actual production mold. This stage reveals their iteration speed and problem-solving approach.

Ask how they handle design-related modifications at this stage—are there engineering change order (ECO) fees, or is there a collaborative process to optimize the design? A supplier focused on getting the tool right before mass production will have a clear, staged sampling protocol, even if it adds a week to the timeline, saving you from costly mold rework later.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Emily Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-17

### Answer 3

From a production scheduling standpoint, the quoted lead time is only half the story. You must assess their capacity to deliver your 50k units within a stable production window. Ask about their current machine shop load and available press capacity for a two-shot molding project.

A factory offering an extremely short lead time might be under-utilized, which is not inherently bad, but could also mean they plan to outsource the mold machining, adding layers of coordination risk. A realistic supplier will discuss slotting your mold into their machining schedule and then securing a dedicated production cell.

Inquire about their plan for production ramp-up: will they run a pilot batch of 500-1000 pieces before full mass production to validate process stability? This step, while adding time, is crucial for catching issues before you commit to a full container load.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Olivia Chen
**Date:** 2026-10-17

### Answer 4

The quality plan embedded in the quote is a decisive factor. A low price often comes with a bare-minimum quality commitment. Request their detailed control plan. For a two-shot grip, it must specify inspection checkpoints for the critical interface adhesion (e.g., peel test frequency and method), dimensional checks on the internal ribs, and visual standards for the overmolded texture and logo.

Ask about their in-process quality control: how do they monitor and document key injection parameters like barrel temperatures, injection speed, and holding pressure for each shot? A supplier relying solely on final inspection is a high-risk choice.

Also, clarify the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) they are quoting under—standard MIL-STD-105/ISO 2859-1—and for which defect classifications (critical, major, minor). Ensure the AQL for critical defects, like material separation, is at a stringent level (e.g., 0.65), not a generic 2.5.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Linda Xu
**Date:** 2026-10-17

### Answer 5

Evaluating a supplier's foundational systems is as important as the product quote. Several signals in their documentation can indicate risk. A quote lacking detail on the mold steel grade or material specifications suggests a lack of technical rigor.

Request evidence of their quality management system, such as ISO 9001 certification, though the implementation matters more than the certificate. Ask for a summary of their internal process audit findings for their molding department—how do they ensure machine calibration and preventive maintenance?

A key question is their employee turnover rate in key technical positions; high turnover can disrupt your project continuity. In a virtual audit, ask to see their non-conforming material process and corrective action reports. A systematic approach to root cause analysis for defects is a strong positive indicator of long-term reliability.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Michael Wu
**Date:** 2026-10-17

### Answer 6

Packaging is rarely detailed in initial quotes but can impact cost, quality, and logistics. For tool grips, improper packaging can cause deformation, scuffing of the soft TPE surface, or contamination. Ask each supplier to specify their proposed packaging method: bulk packing in poly bags, individual blister packs, or compartmentalized cartons? The choice affects both unit cost and in-transit protection.

For private label, confirm they understand and can execute your labeling requirements for master cartons and individual product packaging, including barcode compliance. Also, consider environmental factors: will the grips be stored or shipped in high-humidity conditions? If so, desiccant packets might be necessary. A professional supplier will provide packaging samples and a cost breakdown for different options, allowing you to balance protection with overall landed cost.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Eric Zhao
**Date:** 2026-10-16

### Answer 7

For market readiness, material compliance is non-negotiable. The quote should explicitly state that all polymers (TPE and PP) comply with relevant regulations for your target markets, such as EU REACH, RoHS, and for North America, Proposition 65 and FDA CFR 21 (if applicable for handled tools). Request that they provide full material disclosure sheets and certificates of compliance from their raw material suppliers.

For certain tool applications, you may need specific flammability ratings or UL component recognition. A reliable manufacturer will have a process for managing this documentation and will not treat it as an afterthought. Be wary of a supplier that states "materials are standard compliant" without offering to provide test reports; this can lead to customs clearance delays or product recalls.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** David Zhang
**Date:** 2026-10-16

### Answer 8

Successful production transfer hinges on clear project governance. Evaluate suppliers on their proposed project management structure. Do they assign a dedicated project manager as your single point of contact? What is their communication protocol and frequency for updates?

Crucially, examine their sample approval process. It should involve a formal sample submission report with dimensional data and photos, requiring your signed approval before mass production begins. This formal gate prevents misunderstandings.

Also, discuss their change management procedure. If a design tweak is needed after mold kick-off, how are costs and timeline impacts communicated and approved? A supplier with a structured stage-gate process, even for a 50k-unit order, demonstrates the maturity needed to navigate the complexities of a two-shot molding project from tooling to delivery.

**status:** suggested
**Author:** Daniel Yang
**Date:** 2026-10-16

## Related Resources

- [Custom Manufacturing Q&A](https://www.jaterson.com/qa/oem-odm/)
- [Products](https://www.jaterson.com/products/)
- [Capabilities](https://www.jaterson.com/capabilities/)
- [Custom Manufacturing](https://www.jaterson.com/custom-manufacturing/)
- [Manufacturing Guides](https://www.jaterson.com/manufacturing/)
- [Buying Guides](https://www.jaterson.com/buying/)
- [Manufacturing Knowledge Base](https://www.jaterson.com/knowledge/)

## Structured Data

```json
[
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "QAPage",
      "mainEntity": {
        "@type": "Question",
        "name": "How to Compare Quotes from Private Label Tool Grip Suppliers?",
        "text": "I'm in the final stages of selecting a B2B supplier for our private label tool grips, responsible for both the injection mold and mass production. Our design is finalized—a complex, two-shot molded grip with internal ribs for strength and an overmolded TPE surface with laser-etched logos. Initial order quantity is set at 50,000 pieces, with potential for repeat orders. I've received detailed quotes from three factories, but they're apples to oranges. One offers an incredibly low piece price but charges a high, non-amortized mold cost. Another has a moderate piece price but includes mold amortization over the first 100k units. JATERSON's quote is in the middle. Lead times are another puzzle: 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 14 weeks. My management is pushing for cost savings, but my experience tells me the cheapest tooling often leads to maintenance headaches and production delays. What are the critical, often-overlooked line items in a mold and part quote that signal a supplier's long-term reliability? How should I interpret lead time differences—are shorter times a red flag for cutting corners, or a sign of efficiency? I need a framework to compare these proposals on equal footing.",
        "answerCount": 8,
        "upvoteCount": 7,
        "datePublished": "2026-10-16T23:21:16Z",
        "dateModified": "2026-10-16T23:26:30Z",
        "author": {
          "@type": "Person",
          "name": "Anonymous",
          "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html"
        }
                ,"acceptedAnswer": {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Comparing quotes for private label tool grips, especially involving complex tooling like two-shot molds, requires looking beyond the bottom line. The significant price and lead time variations you're seeing are common, and they often reflect fundamental differences in manufacturing philosophy, cost structure, and risk allocation between a short-term job shop and a partner invested in your long-term production success. Start by standardizing the quotes. Demand a breakdown that separates the mold cost, piece price, and all ancillary fees . For the mold, the critical question is ownership and amortization. A high, non-amortized mold fee suggests the supplier expects to profit from the tooling itself and may not be invested in a long-term partnership. A model that amortizes the cost over the first 100k-200k units aligns the supplier's success with your volume—they recover their investment through production, incentivizing quality and on-time delivery to secure those repeat orders. Scrutinize the mold material specified (e.g., pre-hardened steel vs. hardened steel like H13). H13 is more expensive but offers 5-10 times the lifespan, crucial for a 50k+ unit order and future runs. A quote using cheaper steel may need replacement or major repair sooner, causing costly production downtime. For the piece price, the material grade is a major lever. Insist on knowing the exact TPE and PP grades proposed (e.g., brand and series). A 30% price difference could be a supplier using generic, non-UV-stable TPE that will discolor, versus a premium grade with stabilizers. Request material datasheets and certificates of analysis. The cycle time assumption is another hidden factor. A faster, optimistic cycle time makes the price look good but may be unachievable without causing sink marks or weak weld lines. A reputable manufacturer will provide a conservative cycle time estimate based on their Design for Manufacturability (DFM) analysis. Also, examine costs for secondary operations: Is laser etching included? How are they handling degating and inspection? Vague or excluded secondary process costs will appear later as change orders. Lead time is a composition of several phases: mold design (1-2 weeks), material procurement (1-2 weeks), mold machining (4-8 weeks for a complex two-shot tool), sampling and approval (2-3 weeks), and production ramp-up. A quote of 8 weeks total is likely quoting only the machining time, ignoring design, sampling, and your approval loop—a major red flag indicating inexperience or intentional underestimation. A realistic lead time for a new, complex two-shot mold is 12-14 weeks. A 16-week quote might indicate current capacity constraints or could reflect a more meticulous, staged approval process with multiple sample iterations. Ask each supplier for a detailed Gantt chart with milestones (e.g., mold design complete, T0 sample ready). A supplier willing to provide this demonstrates project management discipline and transparency. To judge suppliers, move beyond the document and engage technically. Issue a standardized request for information (RFI) alongside your quote request. Key questions should include: "What is your standard procedure for ensuring adhesion between PP and TPE materials?" They should mention material compatibility testing, potential surface treatment like plasma, and strict control of process parameters like melt and mold temperatures. "Describe your mold maintenance schedule and who bears the cost for wear-and-tear repairs during the production contract." A clear, proactive maintenance plan shared by the supplier indicates they expect the mold to last. "Provide a sample of your First Article Inspection report and your dimensional control plan for critical features like grip diameter and logo alignment." Finally, request a DFM report. Even with a finalized design, a competent manufacturer will provide one, highlighting potential issues like wall thickness transitions, gate locations, and ejection pin marks. Their willingness to invest engineering time upfront without charge is a strong indicator of partnership intent. The absence of a DFM, or a very superficial one, suggests they will simply build what you drew, problems and all, and charge you for mold modifications later. In summary, create a comparison matrix. List each supplier, and for each, populate columns with: Mold Cost (amortized model/steel type), Piece Price (with material specs), Realistic Lead Time (with milestone breakdown), DFM Quality, and Responses to Technical RFI. The cheapest upfront cost often becomes the most expensive total cost of ownership when you factor in mold repairs, production delays, and quality rejections. Your goal is to identify the supplier whose quote reflects a transparent, sustainable, and quality-focused manufacturing process, not just the lowest bid.",
            "upvoteCount": 7,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html#acceptedAnswer",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-17T02:05:39Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Sophia Wang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/sophia.html"}        }
                ,"suggestedAnswer": [
                  {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Beyond the quote, the prototyping phase is a critical litmus test. For a functional component like a tool grip, you need production-intent samples, not just appearance models. Inquire about their sample lead time and cost structure. A supplier that offers a rapid, low-cost T0 sample from soft tooling or a 3D-printed mold insert might help with early fit checks, but it tells you nothing about the final material properties or the robustness of the hard tool. More important is their plan for T1 samples from the actual production mold. This stage reveals their iteration speed and problem-solving approach. Ask how they handle design-related modifications at this stage—are there engineering change order (ECO) fees, or is there a collaborative process to optimize the design? A supplier focused on getting the tool right before mass production will have a clear, staged sampling protocol, even if it adds a week to the timeline, saving you from costly mold rework later.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html#suggestedAnswer-2",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-17T01:45:13Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Emily Chen","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/emily.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "From a production scheduling standpoint, the quoted lead time is only half the story. You must assess their capacity to deliver your 50k units within a stable production window. Ask about their current machine shop load and available press capacity for a two-shot molding project. A factory offering an extremely short lead time might be under-utilized, which is not inherently bad, but could also mean they plan to outsource the mold machining, adding layers of coordination risk. A realistic supplier will discuss slotting your mold into their machining schedule and then securing a dedicated production cell. Inquire about their plan for production ramp-up: will they run a pilot batch of 500-1000 pieces before full mass production to validate process stability? This step, while adding time, is crucial for catching issues before you commit to a full container load.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html#suggestedAnswer-3",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-17T01:44:55Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Olivia Chen","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/olivia.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "The quality plan embedded in the quote is a decisive factor. A low price often comes with a bare-minimum quality commitment. Request their detailed control plan. For a two-shot grip, it must specify inspection checkpoints for the critical interface adhesion (e.g., peel test frequency and method), dimensional checks on the internal ribs, and visual standards for the overmolded texture and logo. Ask about their in-process quality control: how do they monitor and document key injection parameters like barrel temperatures, injection speed, and holding pressure for each shot? A supplier relying solely on final inspection is a high-risk choice. Also, clarify the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) they are quoting under—standard MIL-STD-105/ISO 2859-1—and for which defect classifications (critical, major, minor). Ensure the AQL for critical defects, like material separation, is at a stringent level (e.g., 0.65), not a generic 2.5.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html#suggestedAnswer-4",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-17T01:17:53Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Linda Xu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/linda.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Evaluating a supplier's foundational systems is as important as the product quote. Several signals in their documentation can indicate risk. A quote lacking detail on the mold steel grade or material specifications suggests a lack of technical rigor. Request evidence of their quality management system, such as ISO 9001 certification, though the implementation matters more than the certificate. Ask for a summary of their internal process audit findings for their molding department—how do they ensure machine calibration and preventive maintenance? A key question is their employee turnover rate in key technical positions; high turnover can disrupt your project continuity. In a virtual audit, ask to see their non-conforming material process and corrective action reports. A systematic approach to root cause analysis for defects is a strong positive indicator of long-term reliability.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html#suggestedAnswer-5",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-17T00:42:21Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Michael Wu","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/michael.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Packaging is rarely detailed in initial quotes but can impact cost, quality, and logistics. For tool grips, improper packaging can cause deformation, scuffing of the soft TPE surface, or contamination. Ask each supplier to specify their proposed packaging method: bulk packing in poly bags, individual blister packs, or compartmentalized cartons? The choice affects both unit cost and in-transit protection. For private label, confirm they understand and can execute your labeling requirements for master cartons and individual product packaging, including barcode compliance. Also, consider environmental factors: will the grips be stored or shipped in high-humidity conditions? If so, desiccant packets might be necessary. A professional supplier will provide packaging samples and a cost breakdown for different options, allowing you to balance protection with overall landed cost.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html#suggestedAnswer-6",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-16T23:41:30Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Eric Zhao","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/eric.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "For market readiness, material compliance is non-negotiable. The quote should explicitly state that all polymers (TPE and PP) comply with relevant regulations for your target markets, such as EU REACH, RoHS, and for North America, Proposition 65 and FDA CFR 21 (if applicable for handled tools). Request that they provide full material disclosure sheets and certificates of compliance from their raw material suppliers. For certain tool applications, you may need specific flammability ratings or UL component recognition. A reliable manufacturer will have a process for managing this documentation and will not treat it as an afterthought. Be wary of a supplier that states "materials are standard compliant" without offering to provide test reports; this can lead to customs clearance delays or product recalls.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html#suggestedAnswer-7",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-16T23:37:42Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "David Zhang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/david.html"}          }
          ,          {
            "@type": "Answer",
            "text": "Successful production transfer hinges on clear project governance. Evaluate suppliers on their proposed project management structure. Do they assign a dedicated project manager as your single point of contact? What is their communication protocol and frequency for updates? Crucially, examine their sample approval process. It should involve a formal sample submission report with dimensional data and photos, requiring your signed approval before mass production begins. This formal gate prevents misunderstandings. Also, discuss their change management procedure. If a design tweak is needed after mold kick-off, how are costs and timeline impacts communicated and approved? A supplier with a structured stage-gate process, even for a 50k-unit order, demonstrates the maturity needed to navigate the complexities of a two-shot molding project from tooling to delivery.",
            "upvoteCount": 0,
            "url": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/compare-quotes-private-label-tool-grip-suppliers.html#suggestedAnswer-8",
            "datePublished": "2026-10-16T23:26:30Z",
            "author": {"@type": "Person","name": "Daniel Yang","url": "https://www.jaterson.com/team/daniel.html"}          }
                  ]
              }
    },
    {
      "@context": "https://schema.org",
      "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
      "itemListElement": [
          {"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/"},{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Custom Manufacturing Q&A", "item": "https://www.jaterson.com/qa/oem-odm/"}          ,{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "How to Compare Quotes from Private Label Tool Grip Suppliers?"}
      ]
    }
]
```